1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8500.1997.tb01238.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Processes of Public Accountability

Abstract: There is a sameness to writing on public accountability which does not always do justice to the subject. With responsibility and accountabilio conflated and an idealised version of the Westminster model held up as the only test, ministers constantly appear irresponsible. Yet a more complex account of public accountability is possible, one which acknowledges that no single institution can undertake the important work of ensuring accountability from ministers, the parliament and public servants.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
123
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
123
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There is extensive literature expressing concern about the applicability of private sector financial reporting standards for the public sector (see, for example, Barton, 1999;Christensen, 2003;Ellwood & Newberry, 2007;Guthrie, 1998;Lapsley, 1999;2009;Mulgan, 1997;Newberry & Pallot, 2005). Such standards do not sufficiently acknowledge the fundamental differences in the nature, purpose and functions of government from those of the private sector, and may thus result in financial information that is not relevant for stakeholder needs (Barton, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is extensive literature expressing concern about the applicability of private sector financial reporting standards for the public sector (see, for example, Barton, 1999;Christensen, 2003;Ellwood & Newberry, 2007;Guthrie, 1998;Lapsley, 1999;2009;Mulgan, 1997;Newberry & Pallot, 2005). Such standards do not sufficiently acknowledge the fundamental differences in the nature, purpose and functions of government from those of the private sector, and may thus result in financial information that is not relevant for stakeholder needs (Barton, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, all regional authorities have to report their programs and activities in accountable and transparent Local Government Financial Statements (LKPD). As argued by Sinclair (1995) and Mulgan (1997), who developed the concept of accountability which synthesizes the accountability framework in public sector, local government heads are obliged to provide high commitment in carrying out their activities. In order to produce high quality LKPD, they have to ensure the availability of competent human resources in managing local government finance and develop reliable accounting information system, which is supported by reasonable internal control system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accountability plays a greater role in public administration (Mulgan, 1997;Yang, 2012). The term is socially constructed and is a contested concept (Michael, 2005;Mulgan, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Public sector accountability requires governments to justify the source and utilization of public resources (Almquist et al, 2013;De Jesus and Eirado, 2012;Laegreid et al, 2008) because governments are largely perceived as inefficient and poorly performing in service delivery (Barton, 2006;Hui et al, 2011). The growing concern on how government spends money increases public demand and pressure on the government to manage resources prudently (Bakar et al, 2011;Almquist et al, 2013;Bhuiyan and Amagoh, 2011;Mulgan, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%