2005
DOI: 10.1093/eltj/cci024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Project Framework: a tool for language, content, and skills integration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
68
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Beckett & Slatter [26]; Beckett [27]; Gou [17]; Kobayashi [25] confirm the effectiveness of PBL in integrated language and content teaching. One notable feature of PBL is that it enables learners to develop better understanding of the topic [6].…”
Section: International Journal Of Languages Literature and Linguistimentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Beckett & Slatter [26]; Beckett [27]; Gou [17]; Kobayashi [25] confirm the effectiveness of PBL in integrated language and content teaching. One notable feature of PBL is that it enables learners to develop better understanding of the topic [6].…”
Section: International Journal Of Languages Literature and Linguistimentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Less than one fifth of the participants gave positive feedback about project work; one quarter had mixed feelings and the rest were not in favor of PBL [26]. This dissatisfaction reflects "potentially different philosophical, cultural, and linguistic beliefs held by students and teachers"…”
Section: International Journal Of Languages Literature and Linguistimentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The students' experiences using the portfolio framework were investigated by examining learners' written reflections (Beckett, Slater 2005). It was found that only one fifth of the 73 participants enjoyed project work; one quarter had mixed feelings, and 57% perceived it negatively.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional recasting to help students learn how to construct more sophisticated oral causal explanations, as described in Mohan and Beckett (2003), is a useful strategy that depends on teachers being able to assess quickly and scaffold the student so that learning occurs within the zone of negotiation. Slater et al (2006), in their paper on assessing projects as second language and content learning, go beyond teacher recasts by offering ways to raise student consciousness of the features of sophisticated causal explanations, emphasizing for them the importance of what is happening on this developmental path (see also Beckett & Slater, 2005). If teachers are consistently and reflectively assessing student explanations, focusing on aspects that students are having trouble with, they can provide successful assessment-learning cycles for teaching the forms and meanings of causal explanations.…”
Section: Assessing Causal Explanations In the Teaching And Learning Cmentioning
confidence: 99%