The rise and fall of the finance gap In 1931, the Macmillan Committee report (HM Government, 1931) concluded that a "gap" existed in the availability of finance for businesses in amounts of less than £200,000, equivalent to £9 million in 1994 prices. Concern that an absence of appropriate finance has been hindering the birth and development of embryonic, young, and small businesses has remained the concern of many subsequent government reports.The 1971 Bolton and 1979 Wilson reports (HM Government, 1971, 1979 saw the birth and growth of small business to be fundamental for sustained long-term economic growth, and investigated the availability of finance for their development. The Bolton report concluded that the gap had, broadly, been filled by a variety of institutions, but recognized an information gap for entrepreneurs which could be met with appropriate agencies. The Wilson report saw both a loan gap (which could be met with a government loan guarantee scheme), and an equity gap. The latter could be met with a range of measures, including the creation of small business investment companies of the type then established in the USA, as well as a range of fiscal measures to encourage private investment in small companies.The late 1970s and early 1980s witnessed considerable economic growth in California and Massachusetts, derived largely from rapid expansion of new enterprises in some new high-technology industries. This was associated with considerable growth of venture capital finance. Venture capital organizations were recognized as having played a key role in fostering this process (Florida and Kenney, 1988a;Hambrecht, 1984). The Bank of England shared an optimistic view of the potential of the venture capital industry both to meet any "equity gap" in the UK, and to foster new business growth (Bank of England, 1982). Rapid growth in the venture capital industry seemed to show that this was happening (Shilson, 1984; Tyebjee and Vickery, 1988).A recent government report (Department of Trade and Industry, 1991) concludes that "small firms in Great Britain currently face few difficulties in raising finance for their innovation and investment proposals in the private sector". It notes "results suggest, as many commentators since the time of Bolton have argued, that the institutional framework for investment in small firms is broadly adequate and not in need of supplementation by public sector institutions". These reports have provided little support for large scale direct involvement of the public sector in providing capital to young businesses.