2018
DOI: 10.1080/10548408.2018.1435332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The psychological process of travel destination choice

Abstract: This paper reviews literature on travel destination choice and organizes these studies systematically. A "cell-system" structure is proposed to describe the psychological process of travel destination choice. In forming decisions on vacations, tourists gather information on potential destinations and evaluate visit intentions among potential destinations ("cell"). The visit intentions are successively compared while information is updated in the process ("system"). The "cell-system" structure provides a clear … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(140 reference statements)
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the present study unveiled that traveller behaviour is heterogeneous, as their decisions are shaped by several different factors (for example, different motivational factors and personalities) in times of crisis. This has been supported by both the concept developed in this paper and the travel destination choice model (Figure 1), both of which are generally consistent with prior research (Alvarez and Asugman, 2006;Qiu et al, 2018). While some tourists are less concerned with security threats and would continue to show tendencies to travel to affected locations, other travellers may either cancel their holiday plans completely and avoid risky places or postpone their trips until traveller confidence in affected destinations is restored (Liu and Pratt, 2017;Mansfeld and Pizam, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…First, the present study unveiled that traveller behaviour is heterogeneous, as their decisions are shaped by several different factors (for example, different motivational factors and personalities) in times of crisis. This has been supported by both the concept developed in this paper and the travel destination choice model (Figure 1), both of which are generally consistent with prior research (Alvarez and Asugman, 2006;Qiu et al, 2018). While some tourists are less concerned with security threats and would continue to show tendencies to travel to affected locations, other travellers may either cancel their holiday plans completely and avoid risky places or postpone their trips until traveller confidence in affected destinations is restored (Liu and Pratt, 2017;Mansfeld and Pizam, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…These perceptions are often intertwined with visitors' values and motivations [15], the latter of which are often considered either push factors (e.g., self-expression, self-development, relaxation, and prestige internally motivating a person to travel) or pull factors (e.g., external to the individual and illustrated in the attributes of a destination) [16]. Considering the various studies connecting the effects of self-concept with destination image (self-congruity), and destination with attributes and a tourist's ideal expectations (functional congruity), on travel behaviour, destination selection is largely precipitated by the connection tourists make between expectations and the potential advantages of visiting [17][18][19][20][21][22]. Furthermore, tourists develop strategies of self-regulating emotions as they consider particular holidays; emotions that can be either positive (in attracting a tourist to the destination) or negative (by discouraging a tourist from selecting the destination) [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choosing a holiday destination is a complex process, with many components and influenced by a number of psychological and non-psychological variables [38]. The attitude of tourists towards a destination and the perceived control over the trip are significantly influenced by the secondary information that gives tourists the opinions of other people about potential destinations [39]. A significant source of secondary information comes from word-of-mouth (WOM) [40].…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%