2009
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200811373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The quiet Sun magnetic field observed with ZIMPOL on THEMIS

Abstract: Context. The quiet Sun magnetic field probability density function (PDF) remains poorly known. Modeling this field also introduces a magnetic filling factor that is also poorly known. With these two quantities, PDF and filling factor, the statistical description of the quiet Sun magnetic field is complex and needs to be clarified. Aims. In the present paper, we propose a procedure that combines direct determinations and inversion results to derive the magnetic field vector and filling factor, and their PDFs. M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
46
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with the turbulent dynamo scenario, quiet Sun magnetic fields come with strengths in the full range from almost zero to 2 kG (Sánchez Almeida & Lites 2000;Domínguez Cerdeña et al 2006;Martínez González et al 2008;Bommier et al 2009;Viticchié et al 2011). Even if they only fill a small fraction of the quiet photosphere, the part with strong kG fields may be particularly important for a number of reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In agreement with the turbulent dynamo scenario, quiet Sun magnetic fields come with strengths in the full range from almost zero to 2 kG (Sánchez Almeida & Lites 2000;Domínguez Cerdeña et al 2006;Martínez González et al 2008;Bommier et al 2009;Viticchié et al 2011). Even if they only fill a small fraction of the quiet photosphere, the part with strong kG fields may be particularly important for a number of reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Some researchers conclude that the field has to be close to isotropic (Martínez González et al 2008a;Bommier et al 2009;Asensio Ramos 2009), others conclude that the field is preferentially horizontal (Orozco Suárez et al 2007b;Lites et al 2008), and yet others show that stronger fields are preferentially vertical, becoming nearly isotropic in the weak flux density limit (Stenflo 2010). The main reason for these apparent controversial results is that, at our best current observational capabilities and polarimetric sensitivity, we do not resolve individual magnetic structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…To test our inversion code with real data, we used THEMIS/MTR observations obtained by Bommier on 2005 September 13, which were already presented in a paper dealing with azimuth ambiguity solution (Bommier et al 2011). They concern the 630.2 Fe i line and an active region located at L = −3.8 • and b = −11.7 • .…”
Section: Comparison With Unnofit Inversion Of Themis/mtr Datamentioning
confidence: 99%