2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The realities of implementation of Clinical Context Object Workgroup (CCOW) standards for integration of vendor disparate clinical software in a large medical center

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electronic chart review facilitated by the Chart Review module is performed through integration with a tool called Clinical Context Object Workgroup (CCOW) [12], which is available on Duke Medicine workstations. CCOW is typically used during patient care to allow clinicians to open different health IT applications in a way such that are synced to the same patient.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electronic chart review facilitated by the Chart Review module is performed through integration with a tool called Clinical Context Object Workgroup (CCOW) [12], which is available on Duke Medicine workstations. CCOW is typically used during patient care to allow clinicians to open different health IT applications in a way such that are synced to the same patient.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, extensive local validation is needed prior to certifying any CCOW solution as being ready for clinical use. [24]…”
Section: Software Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A system may thus be technically integrated (ie, have one underlying code aggregating multiple subsystems that function collectively as one coordinated system), but the end user may not be able to see this integration and benefit from it (eg, they may still need to switch between screens to get all information they need). Similarly, the end user presentation interface may seem integrated (eg, in clinical portals), but the systems may not allow data to be moved seamlessly between applications, and this can create safety risks (eg, relating to moving/transcribing information) 19 20…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%