2016
DOI: 10.5861/ijrsll.2016.1438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge and Iranian EFL learners’ listening comprehension

Abstract: This study investigates the relationship between depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge and EFL learners' listening comprehension. It is designed to find out whether there is a meaningful relationship between vocabulary knowledge and listening comprehension in general, and to determine which dimension of vocabulary knowledge is a better predictor of successful listening comprehension in particular. Data gathered through three tests including Vocabulary Knowledge Test (VLT), Word Associate Test (WAT), and st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, it seems that deep word knowledge itself is a broad concept that makes it possible to link the three levels of word representation (Perfetti, 2007) and rapidly access from one to the other (fluency and network organisation dimensions), which helps recognize and decode words more quickly and easily (Dujardin et al, 2021). That is, the vocabulary depth reflects how well words are organised in the mental lexicon (Afshari & Tavakoli, 2016). As a result, we agree with Ouellette and Shaw (2014) in that integrity and organisation of the lexical-semantic system is a critical factor in word reading and writing, as it shows the importance of semantic network cohesiveness in reading (Nation & Snowling, 2004) and, according to the lexical quality hypothesis (Perfetti, 2007), the results of the present study seem to reflect the role of mutually integrated and connected representations in efficient reading.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, it seems that deep word knowledge itself is a broad concept that makes it possible to link the three levels of word representation (Perfetti, 2007) and rapidly access from one to the other (fluency and network organisation dimensions), which helps recognize and decode words more quickly and easily (Dujardin et al, 2021). That is, the vocabulary depth reflects how well words are organised in the mental lexicon (Afshari & Tavakoli, 2016). As a result, we agree with Ouellette and Shaw (2014) in that integrity and organisation of the lexical-semantic system is a critical factor in word reading and writing, as it shows the importance of semantic network cohesiveness in reading (Nation & Snowling, 2004) and, according to the lexical quality hypothesis (Perfetti, 2007), the results of the present study seem to reflect the role of mutually integrated and connected representations in efficient reading.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, studies on listening comprehension of Chinese EFL learners (Teng, 2014) indicated that both vocabulary breadth and depth significantly predicted listening comprehension. However, study by Afshari and Tavakoli (2017) on Iranian EFL learners showed that vocabulary size was a better predictor of listening comprehension. As for speaking performance, Milton (2013) suggests that the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and L2 speaking performance has been understudied.…”
Section: Research On Vocabulary Knowledgementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Some researchers (Afshari and Tavakoli, 2017;Alsager and Milton, 2016) considered measuring breadth to have a limited value because it ignores the fact that words can be known to a greater or lesser extent. However, too little is known about the relationship between these various aspects of word knowledge to justify such a qualification.…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%