2020
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.23293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between hippocampal subfield volumes and autobiographical memory persistence

Abstract: Structural integrity of the human hippocampus is widely acknowledged to be necessary for the successful encoding and retrieval of autobiographical memories. However, evidence for an association between hippocampal volume and the ability to recall such memories in healthy individuals is mixed. Here we examined this issue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(130 reference statements)
7
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We speculate that this difference may arise from underpowered samples in previous work or variation in AI administration (e.g., time limits for participant responses). The vast majority of AI studies to date have relied on internal count measures (e.g., Palombo et al, 2018;Barry et al, 2020;Armson et al, 2021 for recent examples), but our findings provide evidence that density and proportion scores may provide a better estimate of autobiographical episodicity. The modest negative correlation between internal density and internal count observed here suggests they are measuring different constructs and should not be used interchangeably.…”
Section: Internal Consistencymentioning
confidence: 62%
“…We speculate that this difference may arise from underpowered samples in previous work or variation in AI administration (e.g., time limits for participant responses). The vast majority of AI studies to date have relied on internal count measures (e.g., Palombo et al, 2018;Barry et al, 2020;Armson et al, 2021 for recent examples), but our findings provide evidence that density and proportion scores may provide a better estimate of autobiographical episodicity. The modest negative correlation between internal density and internal count observed here suggests they are measuring different constructs and should not be used interchangeably.…”
Section: Internal Consistencymentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The hippocampus is composed of distinct subfields, and myelination or iron content in specific subregions may be associated with task performance, as opposed to associations being apparent at the level of the whole hippocampus. Some evidence exists to suggest this may be the case for hippocampal grey matter volume ( Barry et al, 2021 ; Chadwick et al, 2014 ; Palombo et al, 2018 ), and future studies could investigate relationships between task performance and subfield-specific hippocampal grey matter tissue microstructure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to hippocampal outputs via fornix (Gilboa et al, 2006) and subfields, such as CA1 (Bartsch et al, 2011) and CA3 (Miller et al, 2020), damage or dysfunction led to extended retrograde amnesia to episodic, but not semantic, aspects, with CA3 posited to be necessary for integrating information along the cortical default mode network (Miller et al, 2020). The persistence of autobiographical memory details is also related to the volume of the left pre-and para-subiculum, although evidence from lesion studies in humans about the role of the subiculum is lacking at the moment (Barry et al, 2021).…”
Section: Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%