2016
DOI: 10.15365/joce.1903072016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship of a Systemic Student Support Intervention to Academic Achievement in Urban Catholic Schools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Kelly and Majerus (2011) found in their analysis of Chicago School Study data that classrooms implementing rigorous, problem-based instructional techniques tended to generate higher student achievement, but found these techniques to be no more or less prevalent in Catholic schools than other schools. Shields et al (2016), in their evaluation of a comprehensive student support and wrap-around service program, and Lore et al ( 2016), in their evaluation of an early mathematics learning intervention, found that students in Catholic schools receiving these interventions tended to have higher achievement. While these studies found Catholic schools had made space to implement these interventions, neither study described these interventions as necessitating Catholic school environments to be successful.…”
Section: Explaining Student Outcomes In Urban Catholic Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Kelly and Majerus (2011) found in their analysis of Chicago School Study data that classrooms implementing rigorous, problem-based instructional techniques tended to generate higher student achievement, but found these techniques to be no more or less prevalent in Catholic schools than other schools. Shields et al (2016), in their evaluation of a comprehensive student support and wrap-around service program, and Lore et al ( 2016), in their evaluation of an early mathematics learning intervention, found that students in Catholic schools receiving these interventions tended to have higher achievement. While these studies found Catholic schools had made space to implement these interventions, neither study described these interventions as necessitating Catholic school environments to be successful.…”
Section: Explaining Student Outcomes In Urban Catholic Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies included in this review did attempt to account for and explain urban Catholic school sector effects on student outcomes (Carbonaro & Covay, 2010;Kelly & Majerus, 2011;Lore et al, 2016;Robey & Helfenbein, 2018;Shields et al, 2016). Previous research had established that urban Catholic secondary schools have distinct organizational structures-a core academic curriculum that all students take, a decentralized form of governance that allows for local decision-making, a mission-driven sense of community solidarity-that directly contribute to the "common school effect" (Bryk et al, 1993).…”
Section: Explaining Student Outcomes In Urban Catholic Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%