1982
DOI: 10.1080/00382167.1982.9628828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Resistance of Pinus Species to Fire Damage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Old trees with a thick bark usually survive fire, although damages caused by the fire are common as a result of cambium damage at the base of the trunk (Parviainen, 1996). The following conclusion confirms the experimental results of other authors (de Ronde, 1982;Swezy, Agee, 1991;Sidoroff et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Old trees with a thick bark usually survive fire, although damages caused by the fire are common as a result of cambium damage at the base of the trunk (Parviainen, 1996). The following conclusion confirms the experimental results of other authors (de Ronde, 1982;Swezy, Agee, 1991;Sidoroff et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The stem base often is proportionally more protected from thermal injury, i.e. the ratio of bark depth to stem radius decreases with height in the bole, namely in P. pinea and P. halepensis (Pageaud, 1991), P. pinaster and P. radiata (de Ronde, 1982), and P. nigra (Fernandes, data on file), especially in smaller trees, e.g. P. radiata (Jackson et al, 1999).…”
Section: The Relative Fire Resistance Of European Pine Speciesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Low intensity wildfire (flame height <1 m but with a high-residence time) caused fire scars up to a height of 7 m and stem girdling between 22% and 46% of the circumference at stump height. Some effort has been devoted to quantify fire damage to the trunk of P. radiata, which is more likely than in P. pinaster (de Ronde, 1982). Thomson (1978) found bole damage in 0.6% of the sampled trees, for a stand age range of 11-26 years and prescribed fires under 300 kW m À1 of fireline intensity.…”
Section: Pinus Radiatamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It thickens with age and especially with tree girth. Bark thicker than 12 mm will protect the stem cambium of most pines during prescribed fires (de Ronde 1982;Fahnestock and Hare 1964;Goldammer 1983;Kayll 1963). Susceptibility to cambial damage ranges from P. radiata and P. patu/a, the most susceptible, through P. taeda and P. pinaster, and finally to P. caribaea and P. elliottii, the most fire-resistant (de Ronde 1982;de Ronde et al 1986;Langdon 1971;McArthur 1971;Speltz 1968;Van Loon and Love 1973).…”
Section: Cambium and Root Damagementioning
confidence: 99%