2019
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The risk factors of antenatal depression: A cross‐sectional survey

Abstract: Aims and objectives To investigate the prevalence of depression in the third trimester of pregnancy and identify the related demographic risk factors. Background Antenatal depression as a disabling and treatable disease has a wide‐ranging impact on perinatal women and has received extensive attention from researchers. Design A cross‐sectional survey was conducted at three public hospitals. Methods Demographic questionnaire was developed from the literature review, and depression was assessed using the Edinburg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
40
4
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
40
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The availability of mental health resources in rural areas of China is low [36]. Studies have shown that living in rural areas of China is very signi cantly associated with perinatal depression [37]. Despite previous studies which have demonstrated the relationship between family function and depression as well as social support and depression, few studies have included these three variables in one study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The availability of mental health resources in rural areas of China is low [36]. Studies have shown that living in rural areas of China is very signi cantly associated with perinatal depression [37]. Despite previous studies which have demonstrated the relationship between family function and depression as well as social support and depression, few studies have included these three variables in one study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the tools used to assess depression [23] and the inconsistent cut-off point for the EDPS used in previous studies can explain antenatal depression disparities. Nine [14] , 10 [16] , 12 [10] , or 13 [24] have been chosen as cut-off points for depression on the EDPS, which led to different prevalence estimates for antenatal depression. Second, the study population might cause these differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there have been some studies on the prevalence and risk factors for antenatal depression in China [14][15][16] , little is known about antenatal depression of all pregnant women in obstetrics clinics in China, despite a high prevalence of depression in this area. Furthermore, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), a postnatal depression screening tool, was used to assess antenatal depression in prior published papers and different cut-off points were selected for depression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The availability of mental health resources in rural areas of China is low [36]. Studies have shown that living in rural areas of China strongly signi cantly associated with antenatal and postpartum depression [37]. Despite previous studies have demonstrated the relationship between family function and depression as well as social support and depression, few studies have included these three variables in one study to understand the interrelationships and potential mechanisms of social support, family function and depression among antenatal and postpartum women.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%