2018
DOI: 10.35850/kjta.19.6.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Female Executives in Determining Tax Avoidance and the Market Response to the Tax Avoidance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Huang and Kisgen (2013), Francis et al (2014), and Adams et al (2010) present evidence supporting the claim that female executives are less aggressive and more conservative in corporate decision making than male executives. Recent studies on Korean companies also report that corporate financial reporting transparency could be improved by the tendency of female executives to avoid risks (Kim & Hong, 2015; Shin & Lee, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Huang and Kisgen (2013), Francis et al (2014), and Adams et al (2010) present evidence supporting the claim that female executives are less aggressive and more conservative in corporate decision making than male executives. Recent studies on Korean companies also report that corporate financial reporting transparency could be improved by the tendency of female executives to avoid risks (Kim & Hong, 2015; Shin & Lee, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rhee et al (2020) report that female employees diversify the corporate atmosphere and help the company improve its sustainability in terms of tax avoidance. These studies of the impact of female workers on company performance describe the characteristics of female workers as more ethical, secure, and rigorous than male workers in the workplace and suggest that female workers have a positive effect on creating a sustainable corporate atmosphere through diversification of corporate governance (Croson & Gneezy, 2009; Olsen & Cox, 2001; Schubert, 2006; Shin & Lee, 2018; Sunden & Surette, 1998). The researchers argue the rationality of maintaining the proportion of female employees in companies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%