2017
DOI: 10.1007/s40309-017-0131-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of future-oriented technology analysis in e-Government: a systematic review

Abstract: During the last three decades, many governments have incorporated Information and Communication Technologies in their internal and external processes, a phenomenon widely known as electronic government (e-Government). Rationales for eGovernment include increasing public services' efficiency, speed, transparency, accountability, etc., and enhancing relations between government and stakeholders (citizens, businesses, third sector organisations). e-Government programmes are largescale innovation projects; and Fut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several methods (e.g., PRISMA Moher et al (2015), Cochrane Anderson et al (2016)) have been adapted by researchers to conduct a systematic literature review. The references (Khan and Park 2013;Lyzara et al 2019;Sánchez-Torres and Miles 2017) show that the most suitable method for performing a systematic literature review in the Digital Government research domain is the Kitchenham et al (2009) method. To complement our review, we followed Anderson et al (2016) and Keele Staffs (2007) general guidelines as well.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods (e.g., PRISMA Moher et al (2015), Cochrane Anderson et al (2016)) have been adapted by researchers to conduct a systematic literature review. The references (Khan and Park 2013;Lyzara et al 2019;Sánchez-Torres and Miles 2017) show that the most suitable method for performing a systematic literature review in the Digital Government research domain is the Kitchenham et al (2009) method. To complement our review, we followed Anderson et al (2016) and Keele Staffs (2007) general guidelines as well.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their technology can serve a wide range of purposes: improved provision for public services, enhanced business-industry relations, empowerment for people through accessing knowledge, or successful government management. E-government is a type of e-government business that refers to the processes and frameworks required to provide electronic services to the public and collaborate with business partners (Ebrahim & Irani, 2005;Erhan et al, 2017;Mi'rojul & Yunas, 2016;Management, 2010;Sánchez-Torres & Miles, 2017;Woro & Supriyanto, 2013).…”
Section: A Critical Approach To Information and Communication Technolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the background of growing public demand for greater transparency and accountability of the public sector worldwide, including Indonesia. Centralization of public engagement authority and public participation barriers are an obstacle to both public and private openness and accountability (Justice et al, 2006;Sánchez-Torres & Miles, 2017;UNDP, 2004;Woro & Supriyanto, 2013). There has been a "government gap" between the country and other parts of the world to enhance social inclusion and demonstrate greater state transparency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E-Government presents an era of modernity, innovation, and flexibility towards efficient and quality public services [36]. e-Government refers to the implementation of ICT to the public sector, just say the objectives such as increasing administrative efficiency, and providing citizens with easier access to government in terms of information and services [37]. Basically, e-Government computerizes all data and information through the Internet and the World Wide Web as a method for sending government information and services to other communities and businesses and governments [38].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%