2022
DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of informational content of visual speech in an audiovisual cocktail party: Evidence from cortical oscillations in young and old participants

Abstract: Age-related differences in the processing of audiovisual speech in a multitalker environment were investigated analysing event-related spectral perturbations (ERSPs), focusing on theta, alpha and beta oscillations that are assumed to reflect conflict processing, multisensory integration and attentional mechanisms, respectively. Eighteen older and 21 younger healthy adults completed a two-alternative forced-choice word discrimination task, responding to audiovisual speech stimuli. In a cocktail-party scenario w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants' performance was similar to the performance of young adults in two previous studies, using the same test procedure (Begau et al 2021(Begau et al , 2022.…”
Section: Lipreading Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Participants' performance was similar to the performance of young adults in two previous studies, using the same test procedure (Begau et al 2021(Begau et al , 2022.…”
Section: Lipreading Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…To increase the power to detect a true effect, we constrained the electrode sites and time points included in the analysis. That is, based on our previous study on audiovisual speech processing using similar conditions and stimulus material (Begau et al 2022), we averaged the data across a cluster of fronto-central channels (including Cz, Fz, C1, C2). In addition, as we were not interested in anticipatory effects, only post-stimulus time points (i.e., in-between 0 and 1782 ms) were considered for the statistical analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations