2019
DOI: 10.3390/cancers11111633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Merlin/NF2 Loss in Meningioma Biology

Abstract: Mutations in the neurofibromin 2 (NF2) gene were among the first genetic alterations implicated in meningioma tumorigenesis, based on analysis of neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) patients who not only develop vestibular schwannomas but later have a high incidence of meningiomas. The NF2 gene product, merlin, is a tumor suppressor that is thought to link the actin cytoskeleton with plasma membrane proteins and mediate contact-dependent inhibition of proliferation. However, the early recognition of the crucial rol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
62
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unsupervised clustering of the tumors based on their whole-transcriptome profiles revealed three distinct groups that did not directly correlate the WHO grades, but reliably predicted aggressive clinical behavior such as frequency of tumor recurrence. The authors proposed a novel classification that links molecular profile of meningiomas with their potential to recur: (1) benign tumors that carry intact NF2, but have mutations in other genes (e.g., TRAF7, AKT1, KLF4); (2) benign tumors that carry biallelic loss of NF2 and presented with SWI/SNF and PRC2 gene involvement; and (3) aggressive meningiomas with high risk of recurrence that have inactivated NF2 and carry chromosome 1p loss and the loss of the repressor function of DREAM, a chromatin-remodeling complex involved in cell cycle progression 38 . These findings underscore the importance of molecular profiling of meningiomas and the limitations of the WHO grading system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unsupervised clustering of the tumors based on their whole-transcriptome profiles revealed three distinct groups that did not directly correlate the WHO grades, but reliably predicted aggressive clinical behavior such as frequency of tumor recurrence. The authors proposed a novel classification that links molecular profile of meningiomas with their potential to recur: (1) benign tumors that carry intact NF2, but have mutations in other genes (e.g., TRAF7, AKT1, KLF4); (2) benign tumors that carry biallelic loss of NF2 and presented with SWI/SNF and PRC2 gene involvement; and (3) aggressive meningiomas with high risk of recurrence that have inactivated NF2 and carry chromosome 1p loss and the loss of the repressor function of DREAM, a chromatin-remodeling complex involved in cell cycle progression 38 . These findings underscore the importance of molecular profiling of meningiomas and the limitations of the WHO grading system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, Merlin protein expression was not analyzed in this study; however, it is plausible that the meningioma cells exhibited somatic mutations in NF2, and therefore had non-functional Merlin. The loss of Merlin results in increased tumor cell proliferation due to loss of contact inhibition mechanisms [9][10][11]. Although NF2 mutations are the most common, somatic mutations on other genes such as BAM22 and BCR on chromosome 22 have also been shown to play a role in meningioma tumorigenesis [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allelic losses (loss of heterozygosity (LOH)) of this region are found in 40-70% of sporadic and the vast majority of NF2 associated meningiomas. Additionally, NF2 mutations are found in up to 60% of tumors, consistent with a classic two-hit mechanism of tumor suppressor gene inactivation [2,[14][15][16][17]. Usually, it is proposed that meningiomas progress from low-grade to high-grade tumors, although this is not always easy to be demonstrated [18], and cytogenetic studies propose a higher amount of chromosomal gains and losses according to the grade of tumors [19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%