1990
DOI: 10.1099/0022-1317-71-10-2401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of mucosal antibody in immunity to infectious laryngotracheitis virus in chickens

Abstract: The role of mucosal antibody in recovery from a primary infection and resistance to reinfection with infectious laryngotracheitis (ILT) herpesvirus was studied in bursectomized chickens, which were unable to synthesize specific antibodies. Viral antigen in the infected trachea was assessed by indirect immunofluorescence on tissue sections and by ELISA. The ability of bursectomized chickens to resolve primary infections as effectively as intact chickens and of vaccinated-bursectomized chickens to prevent the re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
20
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this investigation, the samples were categorized into two age groups (10-35 weeks of age and 36-70 weeks of age). In this study, the prevalence of ILT was found to be 23.24% in the birds of 10-35 weeks of age which was partially consistent with the observation of who found a seroprevalence rate of 25% in the birds of 20-30 weeks of age but it was lower than the findings of Fahey et al (1990) who recorded a prevalence of ILT antibody to be 31% in the birds of 10-30 weeks of age and 37.1% in the birds of 15-35 weeks of age respectively. ILT antibody was found to be 7.83% in 36-70 weeks of age which was similar to the report of Davidson et al (1988).…”
Section: Prevalence Of Ilt On the Basis Of Rearing Systemsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this investigation, the samples were categorized into two age groups (10-35 weeks of age and 36-70 weeks of age). In this study, the prevalence of ILT was found to be 23.24% in the birds of 10-35 weeks of age which was partially consistent with the observation of who found a seroprevalence rate of 25% in the birds of 20-30 weeks of age but it was lower than the findings of Fahey et al (1990) who recorded a prevalence of ILT antibody to be 31% in the birds of 10-30 weeks of age and 37.1% in the birds of 15-35 weeks of age respectively. ILT antibody was found to be 7.83% in 36-70 weeks of age which was similar to the report of Davidson et al (1988).…”
Section: Prevalence Of Ilt On the Basis Of Rearing Systemsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…ILT antibody was found to be 7.83% in 36-70 weeks of age which was similar to the report of Davidson et al (1988). However, for the same age group of birds, Fahey et al (1990) recorded a 16% seroprevalence rate. The prevalence of ILT was 22.78% in the farms maintaining lower level of biosecurity (biosecurity category 2) and 9.17% in the farms maintaining higher level of biosecurity (biosecurity category 1).…”
Section: Prevalence Of Ilt On the Basis Of Rearing Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chickens immunized with ILTV-DgC were protected equally well against challenge with virulent ILTV as animals that had survived primary infection with wild-type or gCrescued viruses, and the absence of challenge virus shedding might indicate induction of sterile immunity. These findings are in line with the hypothesis that cellmediated immune responses against hitherto-unknown proteins are crucial for protection against ILTV infection (Fahey & York, 1990;Guy & Garcia, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…At best, a synergism between neutralizing antibodies and other defence mechanisms may be assumed . Fahey & York (1990) considered cellular defense mechanisms (cytotoxic lymphocytes, lymphokines) as responsible for the protection of epithelial cells in vaccinated animals. Since neither the SNT nor the ELISA results are an indication of the degree of protection against ILT, the differentiation of sera into clearly positive and negative should generally suf® ce because the interest is whether a¯ock had been in contact with ILT ® eld or vaccine virus (Andreasen et al, 1990) and not the immune status of individual animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%