2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2014.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of neuroplasticity in experimental neck pain: A study of potential mechanisms impeding clinical outcomes of training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TMS studies have shown that experimental pain stimulation can alter the excitability of the corticomotor system (Farina et al 2001; Valeriani et al 2001). However, contrary to the study by Stancák et al (that suggest a priming of the motor cortex in the presence of pain), TMS studies generally report reduced corticospinal excitability following nociceptive stimuli (Boudreau et al 2007; Mercier and Leonard 2011; Schabrun and Hodges 2012; Schabrun et al 2013; Rittig-Rasmussen et al 2014). Some researchers have suggested that these corticomotor effects could explain the negative impact that pain can have on motor learning (Boudreau et al 2007; Rittig-Rasmussen et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…TMS studies have shown that experimental pain stimulation can alter the excitability of the corticomotor system (Farina et al 2001; Valeriani et al 2001). However, contrary to the study by Stancák et al (that suggest a priming of the motor cortex in the presence of pain), TMS studies generally report reduced corticospinal excitability following nociceptive stimuli (Boudreau et al 2007; Mercier and Leonard 2011; Schabrun and Hodges 2012; Schabrun et al 2013; Rittig-Rasmussen et al 2014). Some researchers have suggested that these corticomotor effects could explain the negative impact that pain can have on motor learning (Boudreau et al 2007; Rittig-Rasmussen et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, contrary to the study by Stancák et al (that suggest a priming of the motor cortex in the presence of pain), TMS studies generally report reduced corticospinal excitability following nociceptive stimuli (Boudreau et al 2007; Mercier and Leonard 2011; Schabrun and Hodges 2012; Schabrun et al 2013; Rittig-Rasmussen et al 2014). Some researchers have suggested that these corticomotor effects could explain the negative impact that pain can have on motor learning (Boudreau et al 2007; Rittig-Rasmussen et al 2014). Supporting this are the results of Rittig-Rasmussen et al (Rittig-Rasmussen et al 2014) who have observed that the change in corticospinal excitability (increased motor-evoked potential [MEP] amplitudes) noted following upper trapezius training was completely blocked by a hypertonic muscle saline injection, with the effect being apparent up to 7 days post-training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Items consistently unmet by reviewed studies related to internal and external validity. For example, male and female participants were unequally represented in the majority of study samples (Macefield et al, 2007) and sample size calculations were rarely performed a priori (Rittig-Rasmussen et al, 2014). No study blinded the investigator during data analysis and all recruited a sample of convenience.…”
Section: Methodological Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data will then be organised into windows to capture commonly assessed time frames during and after recovery from pain (Figure 1). For example, in tonic pain models, MEPs have been measured 0-10 [26], 11-20 [27] and 21-30 [28] minutes after pain resolution.…”
Section: Data Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%