2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of social learning in fostering farmers’ pro-environmental values and intentions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Social learning is a widespread concept in the literature on the management of natural resources (Noguera-Mendez et al 2016;Rodela 2013;van Mierlo and Beers 2018). It has predominantly been described in multi-stakeholder processes for the development of joint actions.…”
Section: Social Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social learning is a widespread concept in the literature on the management of natural resources (Noguera-Mendez et al 2016;Rodela 2013;van Mierlo and Beers 2018). It has predominantly been described in multi-stakeholder processes for the development of joint actions.…”
Section: Social Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the communities of practice theory has been proposed in literature as an analytical framework, there are still few studies that have reported application of this theory in empirical research within the African research context especially in assessing social learning through S-C-O programmes. Elsewhere, some empirical studies have been done involving the application of CPT of social learning especially in the rural communities of the Vietnamese Mekong Data (Tran et al, 2018) and in other research settings such as environmental management (Noguera-Méndez et al, 2016) and organizational environment (Angelle, 2008). However, empirical literature is generally lacking on interactions between rural communities and other actors in the context of the S-C-O model.…”
Section: Theoretical Framingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent articles tackle learning in environmental governance from a variety of conceptual approaches, from multi-actor learning (Schmid et al, 2016) and co-learning (Tschakert et al, 2016) to governance learning (Newig et al, 2016), policy learning (McFaden and Huitema, 2016) and social learning (e.g., Short and Duana, 2016;Noguera-Mendez et al 2016;Salvini et al, 2016). However, learning does not guarantee improved governance outcomes.…”
Section: Challenges To Learning In Environmental Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, lessons from research on environmental governance that explores factors that facilitate learning can be helpful in thinking about the institutional work that may be needed to make learning more intentional (Gerlak et al, 2017). For example, literature on social learning has argued that environmental governance processes can be designed to allow actors to develop shared meanings and more robust institutional choices (e.g., Short and Duana, 2016;Noguera-Mendez et al, 2016;Salvini et al, 2016). Additionally, scholars have looked at how transformative learning --or fundamental changes in values and assumptions --can lead to more sustainable solutions to complex environmental governance problems, such as biodiversity loss or climate change (Sims and Sinclair, 2008;Tschakert and Dietrich, 2010;Diduck et al, 2012;O'Brien, 2012;Rogers et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%