2004
DOI: 10.3758/bf03196570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of spatial working memory in visual search efficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

36
212
12
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(261 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
36
212
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It would be interesting to know what other mechanisms are engaged during the formation of visual LTM. Substantial evidence suggests close interaction between visual WM and selective visual attention (Alvarez & Cavanagh, 2004;Awh & Jonides, 2001;Luck & Vogel, 1997;Oh & Kim, 2004;Wheeler & Treisman, 2002;Woodman & Luck, 2004). Since selective visual attention plays an important perceptual function for binding elementary visual features (Treisman, 1982;Treisman & Gelade, 1980), one interesting question is whether this function also plays a role in integrating visual information in LTM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It would be interesting to know what other mechanisms are engaged during the formation of visual LTM. Substantial evidence suggests close interaction between visual WM and selective visual attention (Alvarez & Cavanagh, 2004;Awh & Jonides, 2001;Luck & Vogel, 1997;Oh & Kim, 2004;Wheeler & Treisman, 2002;Woodman & Luck, 2004). Since selective visual attention plays an important perceptual function for binding elementary visual features (Treisman, 1982;Treisman & Gelade, 1980), one interesting question is whether this function also plays a role in integrating visual information in LTM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The narrow WM capacity in the non-pop-out condition is also consistent with the notion that WM cannot be loaded sequentially by adding more locations of targets during serial search. Shifting of the spotlight of attention erases the spatial information previously stored in WM (Awh & Jonides, 2001;Oh & Kim, 2004;Woodman & Luck, 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Egeth (1977) and Logan (1978) found that memory load did not interact significantly with factors that affected several stages of RT tasks, including stimulus degradation, stimulus-response compatibility, and the number of items to be examined in visual search, although memory load increased overall RT in each experiment. Recent experiments by Woodman, Vogel, and Luck (2001), Woodman and Luck (2004), and Oh and Kim (2004) replicated these null interactions with the number of items in a visual search display and showed that interactions could be produced only by concurrent tasks that affected executive processing, as well as loading working memory.…”
Section: Toward a Model Of Plan-level And Task-level Processingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Since then, a number of reports have tested this "amnesic" theory of visual search (e.g., McCarley, Wang, Kramer, Irwin, & Peterson, 2003;Oh & Kim, 2004;Peterson, Kramer, Wang, Irwin, & McCarley, 2001;Rensink, 2000;Takeda & Yagi, 2000;Woodman & Luck, 2004). Reviewing all of these findings is out of the scope of the present report.…”
Section: Memory For Distractors During Interrupted Visual Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%