2013
DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2012.760537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of speed versus working memory in predicting learning new information in multiple sclerosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
44
4
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
44
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, deficits in complex WM and PS were noted in the current sample. Such deficits have been shown to negatively affect the learning and memory process in other neurologically impaired populations . However, correlational analyses conducted on the current data revealed no significant relationship between learning and memory performance, PS deficits, and complex WM deficits in the current sample.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Importantly, deficits in complex WM and PS were noted in the current sample. Such deficits have been shown to negatively affect the learning and memory process in other neurologically impaired populations . However, correlational analyses conducted on the current data revealed no significant relationship between learning and memory performance, PS deficits, and complex WM deficits in the current sample.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Such deficits have been shown to negatively affect the learning and memory process in other neurologically impaired populations. 45,48 However, correlational analyses conducted on the current data revealed no significant relationship between learning and memory performance, PS deficits, and complex WM deficits in the current sample. This indicates that the learning deficit observed herein could reflect a hippocampally mediated learning deficit that is potentially amenable to cognitive rehabilitation focused specifically on learning.…”
Section: H I a R A V A L L O T I E T A Lcontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…We also found a significant correlation between the delayed improvement and processing speed, measured with the SDMT, the retroactive interference and the primacy recall only in this MS subgroup. Interactions between processing speed and verbal learning have been frequently reported in MS, these patients needing more trials to learn the same amount of information as controls [42][43][44][45][46]57] and the spaced learning trials being a successful method in MS memory rehabilitation [3,32,46]. Here, we can hypothesize that a slower processing speed may explain the memory profile of the improving subgroup.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Their interference sensitivity may be increased by both the non-stabilization of their memory trace for the first list and the addition of new items (difficult to learn in a single trial according to their short-term impairment). If these hypotheses account correctly for the situation, the improving subgroup may be help by spaced learning, as previously shown in MS [3,32,46]. The present study would provide a way to select patients likely to benefit from this temporal rehabilitation based on their performances in a classical clinical test (the CVLT).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation