2003
DOI: 10.1111/1469-7610.00171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of the clinician: three‐year predictive value of parents’, teachers’, and clinicians’ judgment of childhood psychopathology

Abstract: The present study was the first to report that clinician's ratings of self-reported and observed behaviors in a semi-structured interview (SCICA) make an important unique contribution to the multiaxial assessment of problem behaviors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We will test whether combining both information sources improves detection of depressive symptoms, without masking distinctive patterns and specific diagnostic information related to the point of view by which one is reporting. So, conform the literature which shows substantial disagreement between reports of multiple informants (children & parents), we predict that both will account for a significant and unique portion of the variance in predicting clinically relevant diagnoses (Ferdinand et al, 2003;Verhulst, Dekker, & van der Ende, 1997) and hereby will improve the discriminant validity of the assessment process.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We will test whether combining both information sources improves detection of depressive symptoms, without masking distinctive patterns and specific diagnostic information related to the point of view by which one is reporting. So, conform the literature which shows substantial disagreement between reports of multiple informants (children & parents), we predict that both will account for a significant and unique portion of the variance in predicting clinically relevant diagnoses (Ferdinand et al, 2003;Verhulst, Dekker, & van der Ende, 1997) and hereby will improve the discriminant validity of the assessment process.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Based on the existing literature, child reports are recognised as important information sources, but could be insufficient among children of young age (Rubio-Stipec, Fitzmaurice, Murphy & Walker, 2003). In line with previous research, it was assumed that parent reports on emotional and behavioural problems account for a better and unique prediction of variance in depressive symptoms (Ferdinand et al, 2003;Verhulst, et al, 1997). Parents are more involved in the day-to-day lives of children and therefore know more about their behaviour and activities (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 The Semi-structured Clinical Interview for Children and Adolescents (SCICA) mimics clinical interviewing by child psychiatrists in everyday clinical practice to assess a child's psychiatric functioning and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) classification. 19 An experienced child psychiatrist (J.v.d.H. ), who received extensive training in using this method, conducted the interview.…”
Section: Diagnostic Reference Test: Psychiatric Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En cambio, la experiencia que los profesores tienen con la conducta de los niños es mucho más restringida en el tiempo, aunque la pueden contrastar con un número mucho mayor y variado de comportamientos de otros niños de edad similar (De los Reyes, Henry, Tolan y Wakschlag, 2009;Drabick, Gadow y Lonely, 2008;Guion, Mrug y Windle, 2009;Hartley et al, 2011). En tercer lugar, las discrepancias entre padres y profesores suelen ser más acusadas en relación a los síntomas internalizantes y menores con los síntomas externalizantes (Berg-Nielsen, Solheim, Belsky y Wichstrom, 2011; Ferdinand, Hoogerheide, Van der Ende, Heigmens, Visser, Koot, Kasius et al, 2003). Las diferentes manifestaciones en estos síntomas podría estar mediatizada por la naturaleza de los contextos en los que se evalúan, así como por los diferentes grados de saliencia e importancia concedida por unos y otros evaluadores (ver Collishaw, Goodman, Ford, Rabe-Hesketh y Pickles, 2009 para una revisión).…”
unclassified