2017
DOI: 10.1080/13510002.2017.1301625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of the saliva antioxidant barrier to reactive oxygen species with regard to caries development

Abstract: Our results indicate that the high levels of antioxidants in saliva increase significantly in children in line with the salivary cariogenic bacterial profiles and caries progression.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
27
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
27
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, both values were higher than the protein concentration measured in cariesfree children (1.65 mg/mL). It must be pointed out that salivary protein concentrations quantified in the different groups included in the study by Jurczak et al in 2017 [31] were almost two-fold higher than in the present study. This is probably because Jurczak et al in 2017 used chewstimulated saliva samples, which are associated with increased protein values as compared to nonstimulated saliva [31].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Nonetheless, both values were higher than the protein concentration measured in cariesfree children (1.65 mg/mL). It must be pointed out that salivary protein concentrations quantified in the different groups included in the study by Jurczak et al in 2017 [31] were almost two-fold higher than in the present study. This is probably because Jurczak et al in 2017 used chewstimulated saliva samples, which are associated with increased protein values as compared to nonstimulated saliva [31].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…It must be pointed out that salivary protein concentrations quantified in the different groups included in the study by Jurczak et al in 2017 [31] were almost two-fold higher than in the present study. This is probably because Jurczak et al in 2017 used chewstimulated saliva samples, which are associated with increased protein values as compared to nonstimulated saliva [31]. In contrast, Tulunoglu et al in 2006 [13] reported that salivary protein values in children aged 7-10 years old (6.5 mg/mL) did not significantly differ from salivary protein values in caries-free children (3.5 mg/mL).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Studies differed in their grouping of caries scores. For example, nine different caries surfaces measures and seven caries teeth measures were identified in this review. Some studies grouped them to classify caries as dentin and enamel lesions while others classified them as initial/early, moderate/established and severe/extensive lesions .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%