2017
DOI: 10.1214/16-aop1124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The scaling limit of random simple triangulations and random simple quadrangulations

Abstract: Let Mn be a simple triangulation of the sphere S 2 , drawn uniformly at random from all such triangulations with n vertices. Endow Mn with the uniform probability measure on its vertices. After rescaling graph distance by (3/(4n)) 1/4 , the resulting random measured metric space converges in distribution, in the Gromov-Hausdorff-Prokhorov sense, to the Brownian map. In proving the preceding fact, we introduce a labelling function for the vertices of Mn. Under this labelling, distances to a distinguished point … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
158
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(81 reference statements)
7
158
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us mention that other convergences toward the Brownian map similar to Theorem 1 have been obtained using also other bijections with labeled trees: Beltran and Le Gall [8] studied random quadrangulations without vertices of degree one, Addario-Berry and Albenque [3] considered random triangulations and quadrangulations without loops or multiple edges and Bettinelli, Jacob, and Miermont [10] uniform random maps with n edges.…”
Section: Approach and Organization Of The Papermentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let us mention that other convergences toward the Brownian map similar to Theorem 1 have been obtained using also other bijections with labeled trees: Beltran and Le Gall [8] studied random quadrangulations without vertices of degree one, Addario-Berry and Albenque [3] considered random triangulations and quadrangulations without loops or multiple edges and Bettinelli, Jacob, and Miermont [10] uniform random maps with n edges.…”
Section: Approach and Organization Of The Papermentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Observe that LR(m) = 1 + i≥1 (i − 1)m i = 2 + (r − 2) + i≥1 (i − 1)m i denotes the number of trees in the forest obtained from T n by removing the reduced tree T n (u n , v n ) when A(u n , v n ) = (m (1) , m (2) , m (3) ) and k wn = r: there are i − 1 components for each of the m i elements of ∅, w n ∪ û n , u n ∪ v n , v n with i children, as well as r − 2 components corresponding to the children of w n different fromû n andv n , and the two components above u n and v n . As previously, the triplet (T n , u n , v n ) is characterized by the forest obtained by removing the reduced tree T n (u n , v n ) and the content of the latter, which is Cont(u n , v n ) plus the information (k wn , χû n , χv n ) about the branch-point.…”
Section: Proof Of Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(In [13,21], the convergence is only stated for the GH topology, but the proof in fact yields the above formulation. This is also stated explicitly in [3,Theorem 4.1].) So, for the pointed GHP topology,…”
Section: Appendix B Convergence To the Brownian Plane For The Local mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…We thus need the notion of local GHP topology, described below. See [3,11,17,20,21] for details on the GH(P) topology, […”
Section: Convergence In the Local Ghp Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation