TheIndigenousAetas ofBataan,Philippines: Extraordinary genetic origins, modern history and land rights

Abstract

The Aeta Magbukún of Bataan in Luzon, the Philippines remain one of the least known and documented Indigenous tribes. They retain primarily subsistence hunter-gathering strategies to supply their basic needs. They also strive for recognition of their ancestral connection with, and rights to inhabit their ancestral forest domains, which is threatened by the expansion of agriculture and urban development by non-Aetas, primarily the majority Tagalog population. The Aeta continue to endure dispossession, poverty and political discrimination through decades of protracted land rights processes. This review explores the potential use of recent genetic evidence in anthropology and human geography to legitimize the Aeta's status as Indigenous people and contradict the perspective of some governments in the Asia Pacific region who question the existence of Indigenous peoples generally, often from fear of land tenure and associated political repercussions. The acquisition and use of genetic research on Indigenous populations is both socially and politically contested through fear of the potential to jeopardize sovereignty claims and lead to biologically-based discrimination. However, the full implications of the potential use of genetic research to legitimize Indigenous status, as described within this research, has yet to be thoroughly explored. By exploring both the genetic and anthropological evidence using a case study of the Indigenous Aeta, this paper provides a unique approach to building a case for Indigenous rights, occupation, use of ancestral lands, self-determination, and ultimately, recognition as Indigenous people.

Geography and indigeneity I

“…Regimes of managing indigeneity become inexorably bound up with the tools at hand. Whereas Indigenous peoples were controlled historically via routines of education, dress and market rules, geography highlights how new technologies are enmeshed in settler-Indigenous dynamics of spatialization and territorialization, as when the US Bureau of Indian Affairs uses GIS (Palmer and Rundstrom, 2013), the military builds counter-insurgency procedures in part through mapping Indigenous territories (Bryan and Woods, 2015), and when genetic information plays an active role in shaping contests over claim, presence and difference in Asia and North America (McHenry et al, 2013; Simpson, 2014). Late liberalism re-tools coloniality-modernity in its image, demanding types of authenticity, sociality and adaptability from Indigenous subjects (e.g.…”

‘The forest is our inheritance’: An introduction to Semai Orang Asli place‐naming and belonging in the Bukit Tapah Forest Reserve

“…In present day postcolonial contexts, where the totalizing forces of globalization and nationalism hold sway, such geographies testify to lifeways that continue to be based on a deep reverence for nature and holistically integrate cultural and environmental knowledge and wisdom practices (see e.g. Attanapola & Lund, 2013;McHenry et al, 2013). The importance of the meaning of places underlies this holism, and toponymy like perhaps no other aspect of indigenous heritage communicates the intimate relationship between people and the landscapes they dwell in.…”