2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11004-014-9549-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Simplex Algorithm for Best-Estimate of Magnetic Parameters Related to Simple Geometric-Shaped Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data were digitized at 0.4-m interval. Several researchers have modeled the same anomaly using different techniques (Silva 1989;Abdelrahman and Sharafeldin 1996;Tlas 2004, 2007;Abdelrahman and Essa 2015;Tlas and Asfahani 2015) assuming a horizontal cylinder as well as thin-sheet structure. It was modeled by means of the present inversion.…”
Section: Parnaiba Anomaly Brazilmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data were digitized at 0.4-m interval. Several researchers have modeled the same anomaly using different techniques (Silva 1989;Abdelrahman and Sharafeldin 1996;Tlas 2004, 2007;Abdelrahman and Essa 2015;Tlas and Asfahani 2015) assuming a horizontal cylinder as well as thin-sheet structure. It was modeled by means of the present inversion.…”
Section: Parnaiba Anomaly Brazilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other elucidation methods that were developed include Fourier transform techniques, Hilbert transforms, monograms, characteristic points and distance approaches, least-squares residual anomalies (Bhattacharyya 1965;Grant and West 1965;Mohan et al 1982;Prakasa Rao et al 1986;Abdelrahman 1994;Abdelrahman and Sharafeldin 1996). Many linear and linearized inversions such as least squares, linearized least squares, normalized local wave number method, analytic signal derivatives, second-horizontal derivatives, Euler deconvolution method, simplex algorithm, fair function minimization have also been developed (McGrath and Hood 1973;Silva 1989;Salem and Ravat 2003;Salem et al 2004;Salem 2005;Salem and Smith 2005;Tlas and Asfahani 2011a, b;Abdelrahman and Essa 2015;Tlas and Asfahani 2015). Global optimization methods such as simulated annealing, very fast simulated annealing, regularized inversion, particle swarm optimization and higher-order horizontal derivative methods (Gokturkler and Balkaya 2012;Sharma and Biswas 2013;Biswas and Sharma 2014a, b;Mehanee 2014a, b;Biswas 2015;Singh and Biswas 2015;Biswas 2016;Biswas and Acharya 2016;Ekinci 2016) have been effectively applied to solve nonlinear parametric inversion problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This anomaly was interpreted by several authors (Tlas and Asfahani, 2015, Abdelrahman and Essa, 2015, Asfahani and Tlas, 2007, Asfahani and Tlas, 2004, Abdelrahman and Sharafeldin, 1996, Gay, 1963 assuming a thin dyke model. The anomaly is interpreted using VFSA to obtain the different parameters.…”
Section: Pima Copper Deposit Arizona Usamentioning
confidence: 60%
“…(z = 66 m), Asfahani and Tlas, 2004 (z = 71.50 m), Asfahani and Tlas, 2007 (z = 71.50 m), Abdelrahman and Essa, 2015 (z = 60 m), Tlas and Asfahani, 2015 (z = 64.1 m), Ekinci, 2016 (z = 67.9 m using derivative method and 68.3 m using PSO) and Abo-Ezz and Essa, 2016 (z = 61.5 m) are in good agreement with the other published literatures as shown in Table 6. Figure 14 depicts the fitting between the observed and interpreted mean model.…”
Section: Pima Copper Deposit Arizona Usamentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation