2013
DOI: 10.1080/0951192x.2011.650880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The size matching and scaling method: a synthesis method for the design of mesoscale cellular structures

Abstract: Mesoscale lattice structures are a type of cellular structure with support element lengths on the order of magnitude of centimetres. These types of structures are engineered for high performance and are used particularly in industries where low weight and high strength are desired. However, designing these structures can be difficult because they can contain thousands of individual elements. To design mesoscale lattice structures, current synthesis methods generally require some form of rigorous, multi-variabl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A fundamental benefit of the approach is that it allows the decoupling of variables characterising various structural design aspects -providing greater freedom and control for designer to achieve targeted variation, as seen in Figure 11(A.ii). Similar research has been pursued by Nguyen et al (2012), who developed a framework for individual unit-cell typology selection for LCM, and by Chang (2010), who expanded the research to include member sizing. The hierarchical complexity of LCM also lends organisation for reduced modelling approaches, as typified in methods by Johnston et al's (2006) and Tam et al's (2017b) that consider each unit-cell, rather than the individual struts, as discrete FEA unit for analyses -thereby also reducing the total number of elements required for analysis.…”
Section: Strategies To Simplify Design Problems With Large Variable Smentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A fundamental benefit of the approach is that it allows the decoupling of variables characterising various structural design aspects -providing greater freedom and control for designer to achieve targeted variation, as seen in Figure 11(A.ii). Similar research has been pursued by Nguyen et al (2012), who developed a framework for individual unit-cell typology selection for LCM, and by Chang (2010), who expanded the research to include member sizing. The hierarchical complexity of LCM also lends organisation for reduced modelling approaches, as typified in methods by Johnston et al's (2006) and Tam et al's (2017b) that consider each unit-cell, rather than the individual struts, as discrete FEA unit for analyses -thereby also reducing the total number of elements required for analysis.…”
Section: Strategies To Simplify Design Problems With Large Variable Smentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Outside of design-oriented investigation, technical research on additive manufacturable LCM in mechanical engineering include experimental analyses of LCM parts additive manufactured using specific AM method (Beyer and Figueroa, 2016), analytical and numerical modelling methods (Deshpande et al, 2001;Johnston et al, 2006), and methods to generate lattice that conform to a given arbitrary design volume, such as the research of Chang (2010), and Nguyen et al (2012), who respectively developed processes for element sizing optimisation and unit topology variation in conformal lattice, and Abd El Malek et al (2005), who incorporated a Heuristic Gradient Projection technique to improve the optimisation of large 3-D space frames. In addition to the focus on stiffness maximisation, mechanical engineering researchers have developed methods for generating LCM to achieve compliant (Li et al, 2009;Zhou, 2010) and dynamic behaviour (Takezawa et al, 2005).…”
Section: Research On Additive Manufactured Lattice Cellular Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various optimization methods have been employed by researchers to develop lattice structures targeted for specific applications. , These methods have been employed from the standpoint of topological optimization by considering either a grid of framelike structures or a set of predefined unit cell geometries and primitives. Applications such as transmission tower design and cantilever beam optimization have been chosen in literature to showcase this methodology. , The methods stated above impose constraints on the objective functions from the given loading conditions, which are typically in the form of stress or force with emphasis on minimizing mass-maximizing strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.1 Lattice Optimization. Although there are currently no preferred optimization approaches for multimaterial lattices, there are a large number of existing approaches for single material lattice structure optimization, such as the size matching and scaling method [22]. The size matching and scaling method has been implemented to design and optimize mesoscale, cellular lightweight structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%