“…Therefore, it is important to reconsider the physical nature of this celestial sign to understand the background solar activity around 774/775. The initial difficulty is partially caused by the rather fragmentary nature and limited amount of information on historical records in this period (Silverman, 1992(Silverman, , 1998Barnard et al, 2017). In this sense, it is always important to analyze the given records in comparison with philological results based on the original records, and parallel cases of visual observations in early-modern times, to derive reasonable conclusions, as is also done for the reconstruction of the amplitude of the Maunder Minimum (Zolotova and Ponyavin, 2015;Vaquero et al, 2015), the reliability of sunspot drawings (Zolotova and Ponyavin, 2015;Usoskin et al, 2015;Carrasco, Álvarez, and Vaquero, 2015;Carrasco, Vaquero, and Gallego, 2018), the reliability of auroral records at that time (Zolotova and Ponyavin, 2016;Usoskin et al, 2017), and intensity of magnetic storms in the 19 --20 centuries (Silverman and Cliver, 2001;Cliver and Dietrich, 2013;Silverman, 2008;Hayakawa et al, 2018f).…”