The Stability of Banking System with Shadow Banking on Different Interbank Network Structures

Abstract

With the rapid development of the financial market, the outbreak of systemic risk is affected by many factors, among which shadow banking is considered to be the essential reason to cause financial crisis and destroy the stability of the banking system. In view of the stability of the banking system, considering shadow banking, interbank lending, and complex relationships between banks, a dynamic complex interbank network model with shadow banking under different network structures is proposed. Based on the model, the effects of ROI, investment periods, average deposit, deposit interest rate, the density of shadow banks, and asset loss are studied quantitatively, and the sensitivity and difference of the banking system with shadow banking under different interbank networks are compared and analyzed. The findings indicate that the spread of systemic risks between banks is closely related to the interbank network structures. With the relatively concentrated interbank network structure, it is easier to increase the probability and degree of risk contagion. Under the random, small-world, and scale-free networks, the random network has the strongest ability to resist and absorb risks, while the small-world network is the weakest. However, once the banking network suffers a big shock, excessive risk will directly break through the protection of the banking network, detonate the systematic risk, and destroy the stability of the banking system with shadow banking. This study contributes to a future empirical research agenda on the topic. Moreover, it gives a reference for policymakers and regulatory authorities to prevent systemic risk introduced by shadow banking.

Counterparty Risk Contagion Model of Carbon Quota Based on Asset Price Reduction

“…In conclusion, the monotonicity and convexity of the probability of credit risk contagion of the carbon quota among firms ψ on carbon performance γ can be proven to be related to the interfirm assessment scores. 10], and γ ∈ (0, 1). At this time, f (−10) < 0 and ∂ 2 ψ ∂F z ij 2 < 0.…”

“…At present, scholars have mainly studied the contagion of counterparty risk from the perspective of traditional finance [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. With the proposed goal of carbon peak and carbon neutrality, green finance has been considered the most important solution [13], and new counterparty risks will be induced in the development of green finance.…”

The Role of the Credit Services Market in Ensuring Stability of the Banking System

“…The scientists Pan and Fan [20] investigated the current realities regarding stability of the banking system, took into account shadow banking, inter-bank lending and complex relationships between banks, and proposed a dynamic complex model of the inter-bank network with shadow banking under various network structures. As a result of research, it was concluded that the spread of systemic risks between banks is closely related to the structures of the interbank network.…”

The Impact of China's Shadow Banking on Systemic Financial Risks

“…Shadow banking emerged in the 1960s and 1970s when European and American countries experienced a disintermediation credit crisis, and then the United States carried out a series of financial innovations to break through interest rate controls, such as asset securitization [5], and deregulated the control of the financial sector. This had led to the development of many financial services and financial institutions with the characteristics of shadow banking.…”