2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2107.10516
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Stationary Prophet Inequality Problem

Abstract: We study a continuous and infinite time horizon counterpart to the classic prophet inequality, which we term the stationary prophet inequality problem. Here, copies of a good arrive and perish according to Poisson point processes. Buyers arrive similarly and make take-it-or-leave-it offers for unsold items. The objective is to maximize the (infinite) time average revenue of the seller.Our main results are pricing-based policies which (i) achieve a 1/2-approximation of the optimal offline policy, which is best … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, rather than using the standard prophet benchmark, we use the arguably more realistic benchmark of the best order-aware online algorithm. This is part of a growing interest in alternative benchmarks to the prophet benchmark Kessel et al [2021], Niazadeh et al [2018], Papadimitriou et al [2021]. For example, Niazadeh et al [2018] quantify the loss due to single-threshold algorithms by the worst-case ratio between the best single-threshold algorithm and the best general online algorithm (single-threshold or not), both under a known order, and show that this 1/2 ratio is tight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, rather than using the standard prophet benchmark, we use the arguably more realistic benchmark of the best order-aware online algorithm. This is part of a growing interest in alternative benchmarks to the prophet benchmark Kessel et al [2021], Niazadeh et al [2018], Papadimitriou et al [2021]. For example, Niazadeh et al [2018] quantify the loss due to single-threshold algorithms by the worst-case ratio between the best single-threshold algorithm and the best general online algorithm (single-threshold or not), both under a known order, and show that this 1/2 ratio is tight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%