2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.11.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The strength of liquid bridges in random granular materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Darabi et al, presented a new coalescence model for binary collision between two identical wet particles, considering capillary and viscous forces exerted by (instantaneously formed) pendular bridges. Despite a variety of researchers that has broadened our understanding of liquid bridges, a study describing a detailed model on the time evolution of a single (pendular) liquid bridge during its formation phase is still missing. This is due to the lack of our understanding how quickly liquid is transported into a liquid bridge, and how much of the liquid (initially present on the particles) is able to flow into the bridge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Darabi et al, presented a new coalescence model for binary collision between two identical wet particles, considering capillary and viscous forces exerted by (instantaneously formed) pendular bridges. Despite a variety of researchers that has broadened our understanding of liquid bridges, a study describing a detailed model on the time evolution of a single (pendular) liquid bridge during its formation phase is still missing. This is due to the lack of our understanding how quickly liquid is transported into a liquid bridge, and how much of the liquid (initially present on the particles) is able to flow into the bridge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bridge volume and the wetting properties of the solid surfaces then determine the shape of the liquid bridge and the capillary pressure. In this case the volume of the liquid bridge acts as a controlling parameter and determines the capillary forces [10,42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interfacial geometries that separate phases are often complicated and are dictated by intermolecular forces, pore structure, pressure and temperature [e.g., Israelachvili , 1992]. At the pore scale, analytical techniques are generally confined to solutions of the Laplace‐Young equation for idealized particle geometries such as spheres or disks [e.g., Fisher , 1926; Mason and Clark , 1965; Orr et al , 1975; Pierrat and Caram , 1997; Richefeu et al , 2006; Grof et al , 2008; Lechman and Lu , 2008]. While such solutions give important physical insights, the need remains for a methodology to address more complicated pore geometries such as in soils [e.g., Hornbaker et al , 1997].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along another path, computational fluid dynamics and lattice gas automata methods have been used to compute the pore‐scale geometrical evolution of liquid bodies in porous media with complex pore geometries, but with the computational overhead of capturing the transport behaviour [ Rothman and Zaleski , 1994]. There has also recently been a coarse‐grained approach based on direct discretized simulation of the liquid‐vapor interface, although this introduces complications associated with the merging and breakup of liquid domains [ Grof et al , 2008]. To address the need for an efficient pore‐scale simulation methodology and overcome some of the aforementioned deficiencies in the previous simulation methods, we developed a coarse‐grained Monte Carlo lattice gas approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%