2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2013.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The teaching and the learning brain: A cortical hemodynamic marker of teacher–student interactions in the Socratic dialog

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
103
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
9
103
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the observed changes in the PFC activity for student–teacher pairs may represent a reduced demand for social interaction following successful teaching–learning tasks. This hypothesis is consistent with the results of previous two-person neuroimaging studies, which have reported synchronous hemodynamic activity of the PFC for student–teacher pairs who exhibited efficient communication (Holper et al, 2013). Additionally, the synchronous change of the PFC activity in both groups may be related to habituation to the game task and/or learning process, though not to the demand for social interaction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the observed changes in the PFC activity for student–teacher pairs may represent a reduced demand for social interaction following successful teaching–learning tasks. This hypothesis is consistent with the results of previous two-person neuroimaging studies, which have reported synchronous hemodynamic activity of the PFC for student–teacher pairs who exhibited efficient communication (Holper et al, 2013). Additionally, the synchronous change of the PFC activity in both groups may be related to habituation to the game task and/or learning process, though not to the demand for social interaction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Although several studies have already reported a PFC activity in the right and/or left hemisphere during two-person interaction tasks (Funane et al, 2011; Cui et al, 2012; Holper et al, 2012, 2013; Cheng et al, 2015), the laterality of the PFC in social interaction remains to be clarified. Differences between tasks per se might partly contribute to the laterality of PFC activity observed during social interaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the analysis of the interaction of brain activity between subjects through measuring simultaneously in two or more subjects (Dommer et al, 2012;Holper et al, 2012Holper et al, , 2013. Studies can be conducted in freely moving subjects.…”
Section: Future Directions Of Fnirimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After following the dialog for more than 20 minutes, we gave participants a ‘different’ square and asked them the same question that led the dialog: to find the side of a square whose area was the double of that of the new square. Puzzlingly, we found that half of the teenagers and almost one third of the adults failed to answer the question [5, 17]. This allowed us to divide participants in two kinds: those who understood that ‘the diagonal argument’ is a rule that can be applied to all squares (we call them Transfer Group, as they built a conceptual knowledge), and those that were incapable of generalizing that knowledge even though they had succeeded the procedural test during the dialog (Non-transfer Group).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%