2009
DOI: 10.1080/08959280903120253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Team Personality–Team Performance Relationship Revisited: The Impact of Criterion Choice, Pattern of Workflow, and Method of Aggregation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
93
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
9
93
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, the model offers a clear distinction between the mechanisms that explain the perfectionism-performance relationship at the individual level (e.g., individual team members' attitudes and behaviors such as achievement motivation, goal setting, and effort expenditure) and those at the team level. Finally, metaanalytical evidence indicates that when team personality composition captures mean levels of traits that promote better personal performance, it also tends to predict better overall team performance (Bell, 2007;Prewett, Walvoord, Stilson, Rossi, & Brannick, 2009). Hence, it is conceivable that when manifested at team-level, perfectionism would influence team performance.…”
Section: Perfectionism and Performancementioning
confidence: 94%
“…In this regard, the model offers a clear distinction between the mechanisms that explain the perfectionism-performance relationship at the individual level (e.g., individual team members' attitudes and behaviors such as achievement motivation, goal setting, and effort expenditure) and those at the team level. Finally, metaanalytical evidence indicates that when team personality composition captures mean levels of traits that promote better personal performance, it also tends to predict better overall team performance (Bell, 2007;Prewett, Walvoord, Stilson, Rossi, & Brannick, 2009). Hence, it is conceivable that when manifested at team-level, perfectionism would influence team performance.…”
Section: Perfectionism and Performancementioning
confidence: 94%
“…An employee's inclination to behave altruistically is more likely when the workplace environment is supportive of prosocial behavior. Others (LePine, Buckman, Crawford, & Methot, 2011;Prewett, Walvoord, Stilson, Rossi, & Brannick, 2009) call for an examination of the relationship between altruism and helping because empirical studies reporting positive relations between altruism and team performance have neglected to specify situations in which altruism affects performance, such as helping behavior.…”
Section: Altruism's Conditional Indirect Effects On Helping Behaviomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Group members scoring high on conscientiousness fit well with the task related demands in teamwork as they spend substantial effort on the task and engage in planning and organizing of group work [25]. Moreover, conscientious members fit well with the interpersonal demands and they perform well in activities that require interdependent and smooth interpersonal relationships, as they constantly help other members of the group to perform their tasks [26]; [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%