2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.gr.2015.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The temporal evolution of the active margin along the Southeast Anatolian Orogenic Belt (SE Turkey): Evidence from U–Pb, Ar–Ar and fission track chronology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Middle-Late Eocene cooling is coeval with final closure of the northern Neotethyan branch and the development of the Izmir-Ankara-Erzincan suture zone (Okay and Tüysüz, 1999;Stampfli and Hochard, 2009). In southern Anatolia there is evidence of Eocene extensional tectonics, including the opening of a backarc basin and deposition of a thick volcanosedimentary succession, the Maden Complex (e.g., Yiğitbaş and Yılmaz, 1996;Robertson et al, 2006;Karaoğlan et al, 2016). The relative chronology of these two contrasting tectonic regimes during the Eocene (shortening in central eastern Anatolia and extension in southern eastern Anatolia) has not yet been resolved and requires much additional work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Middle-Late Eocene cooling is coeval with final closure of the northern Neotethyan branch and the development of the Izmir-Ankara-Erzincan suture zone (Okay and Tüysüz, 1999;Stampfli and Hochard, 2009). In southern Anatolia there is evidence of Eocene extensional tectonics, including the opening of a backarc basin and deposition of a thick volcanosedimentary succession, the Maden Complex (e.g., Yiğitbaş and Yılmaz, 1996;Robertson et al, 2006;Karaoğlan et al, 2016). The relative chronology of these two contrasting tectonic regimes during the Eocene (shortening in central eastern Anatolia and extension in southern eastern Anatolia) has not yet been resolved and requires much additional work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Tauride orogenic belts of Turkey are interpreted as representing a continental fragment that rifted from Gondwana (North Africa) during the Triassic, followed by reamalgamation and continental collision during the OligoMiocene (Karaoğlan et al, 2016) or Miocene (Okay et al, 2010). The Taurides are traditionally divided into three contiguous parts; the western, central and eastern Taurides (Özgül, 1976).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there has been some tectonic transport of ophiolite, the sutures between these terranes are marked by thin zones with abundant ophiolitic rocks that were emplaced during closure of various strands of the Neotethys (Figure ). In SE Anatolia, the Bitlis‐Zagros suture zone marks the former location of the southern branch of the Neotethys Ocean and the zone of collision between the Taurides (Anatolia) and the Arabian continent in the Oligo‐Miocene (Allen & Armstrong, ; Jolivet & Faccenna, ; Karaoğlan, Parlak, Hejl, Neubauer, & Klötzli, ; McQuarrie, ; McQuarrie & van Hinsbergen, ; Okay, Zattin, & Cavazza, ).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…South of the Sürgü fault, the Berit meta‐ophiolite is thrust over the Palaeozoic–Mesozoic Pütürge metamorphic suite and Eocene Maden Group (Figures and ; Karaoğlan, Parlak, Robertson, et al., ; Karaoğlan et al., ; Parlak et al., ; Perinçek & Kozlu, ). The Pütürge metamorphic suite includes greenschist to amphibolite facies gneisses, amphibolite, schist and marble (Bozkaya, Yalçin, Başibüyük, Özfirat, & Yilmaz, ; Perinçek & Kozlu, ).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation