2013
DOI: 10.2174/1871520611313020019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Therapeutical Potential of a Novel Pterocarpanquinone LQB-118 to Target Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells

Abstract: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a challenging neoplasm that despite therapeutic advances requires efforts to overcome the multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotype, the major cause of relapse. The pterocarpanquinone LQB-118 is a new compound that induces apoptosis in leukemia cells. The objective of this work was to analyze the role of LQB-118 in inhibiting the inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs), XIAP and survivin, as well as in modulating the subcellular localization of NFκB, in comparison with idarubicin. LQB… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, we analyzed the effect of a new pterocarpanquinone (LQB 118) [1,2,8] against two different leukemic cells lines, both susceptible to it, but presenting different levels of sensitivity to the compound: the CML cell line K562 and the ALL cell line Jurkat. This pterocarpanquinone has been shown to be effective against other leukemia cell lines such as HL-60, Daudi, and the MDR K562-Lucena-1 [1,2], but showed low toxicity against normal cells, being toxic only at concentrations greater than 10 mmol/l in PBMC cells from healthy donors [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we analyzed the effect of a new pterocarpanquinone (LQB 118) [1,2,8] against two different leukemic cells lines, both susceptible to it, but presenting different levels of sensitivity to the compound: the CML cell line K562 and the ALL cell line Jurkat. This pterocarpanquinone has been shown to be effective against other leukemia cell lines such as HL-60, Daudi, and the MDR K562-Lucena-1 [1,2], but showed low toxicity against normal cells, being toxic only at concentrations greater than 10 mmol/l in PBMC cells from healthy donors [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hit molecule selected LQB-118 ( 1 ) (Fig. 1 ) showed antineoplasic activity against cultured breast cancer, leukemia, lung cancer cell lines and prostate cancer cell [ 5 10 ], some of which present a Multidrug Resistance phenotype [ 11 ]. This hit showed low toxicity for PBMC human blood cells and cell line macrophages, evidencing a high selectivity index [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 shows the naphthoquinone derivatives that have been reported to have anti-AML activity. Mono- or di-substituted monomeric naphthoquinones, including menadione [19], juglone [20], lawson [21], glycinyl-1,4-naphthoquinone [22], plumbagin [23,24,25,26,27], lapachol (and nor-lapachol) [21,28,29], atovaquone [30,31], ramentaceone [32], cordiaquinone J [33], and TW-92 [34] showed anti-AML activity in different AML cell lines and primary cells from AML patients with wide IC 50 s ranging from 0.6 to 100 micromolar (μM), Table 1. Atovaquone was found to have an additive effect when combined with standard induction chemotherapy (cytarabine and daunorubicin) in AML cell lines [31].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-substituted naphthoquinones, including shikonin [35,36,37,38,39] and its derivative SH-7 [40], and other dihydroxy or dimethoxy 1,4-naphthoquinones [41,42], compared with mono- or di-substituted naphthoquinones, demonstrated superior in vitro activity against AML cells with IC 50 s ranging 0.1–4 μM. Heterocyclic monomeric naphthoquinones included furanonaphthoquinones FNQ3 [43] and FN6-one [44], β-lapachone [45,46,47,48,49] and nor-β-lapachone [45,46,50,51], dunnione [47], and pterocarpanquinone LQB-118 [28,52]. FNQ3 was significantly more effective than low dose cytarabine in reducing cell viability ( p < 0.001) and combining the two drugs led to an even greater reduction in cell viability in NB4 and U937 cells ( p < 0.01) [43].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%