PsycEXTRA Dataset 1998
DOI: 10.1037/e536922011-064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The transtheoretical model of behaviour change: Are the stages qualitatively different?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
38
1
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
38
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Why should individuals who intend to quit within the next six months (contemplators) be in a different qualitative stage of action‐readiness than individuals who intend to quit within the next month (preparers)? In line with this reasoning, Kraft, Sutton, and McCreath Reynolds (1999) have demonstrated with a sample of Norwegian daily smokers that precontemplators, contemplators, and preparers were not at different qualitative stages, but rather at different points along an underlying continuum. Similarly, Courneya, Nigg, and Estabrooks (2000) reported that continuous measures of intention explained more variance in exercise behavior than the stage algorithm proposed by the TTM.…”
Section: Continuum Models Versus Stage Models Of Health Behavior Changementioning
confidence: 76%
“…Why should individuals who intend to quit within the next six months (contemplators) be in a different qualitative stage of action‐readiness than individuals who intend to quit within the next month (preparers)? In line with this reasoning, Kraft, Sutton, and McCreath Reynolds (1999) have demonstrated with a sample of Norwegian daily smokers that precontemplators, contemplators, and preparers were not at different qualitative stages, but rather at different points along an underlying continuum. Similarly, Courneya, Nigg, and Estabrooks (2000) reported that continuous measures of intention explained more variance in exercise behavior than the stage algorithm proposed by the TTM.…”
Section: Continuum Models Versus Stage Models Of Health Behavior Changementioning
confidence: 76%
“…First, common among most of the supporting studies they cite (but in contrast with the studies reviewed above), Herzog and Blagg (2007) tested the stage of change algorithm against single item measures of motivation (see also Etter & Sutton, 2002; Kraft, Sutton, & Reynolds, 1999; Sciamanna, Hoch, Duke, Fogle, & Ford, 2000), raising questions about the reliability of the motivational measures used to assess the validity of the staging algorithm. Second, it is plausible that Herzog and Blagg's (2007) participants may have been more motivated than smokers in the population at large because they recruited through ‘newspaper advertisements and flyers distributed at community events’ and paid participants $25 for completing the questionnaire as opposed to proactively recruiting participants from the community (cf.…”
Section: The Transtheoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A linear trend would imply pseudostages, in which groups could be created from a continuum. [8][9][10] Most studies investigating stage models, however, have not explicitly tested for discontinuity patterns. To date, results from the few studies that have examined discontinuity patterns in the transtheoretical model (TTM 11 ) are inconsistent, warranting further research.…”
Section: Stage Models Of Health Behavior Changementioning
confidence: 99%