1986
DOI: 10.1080/02566702.1986.9648048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of the cellulase digestion procedure for indexing the dry matter digestibility of forages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the overall quality of grass is affected by the amount of dietary fiber it contains (McDonald et al, 1996). The dry matter digestibility of grass species was assessed by the in vitro digestible dry matter method of Zacharias (1986) because this technique incorporates concentrations, ratios and structures of forage constituents in an index of potential for breakdown by rumen microbial populations . Phosphorus concentrations were ascertained spectrophotometrically according to the micro technique of the AOAC (1990).…”
Section: Laboratory Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the overall quality of grass is affected by the amount of dietary fiber it contains (McDonald et al, 1996). The dry matter digestibility of grass species was assessed by the in vitro digestible dry matter method of Zacharias (1986) because this technique incorporates concentrations, ratios and structures of forage constituents in an index of potential for breakdown by rumen microbial populations . Phosphorus concentrations were ascertained spectrophotometrically according to the micro technique of the AOAC (1990).…”
Section: Laboratory Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The in vitro digestibility of herbage samples was estimated from cellulase DM disappearance (CDMD) (Zacharias, 1986). Herbage N was estimated using an auto-analyzer, incorporating a technique based on a modification of the Kjeldahl method (Hambleton, 1977).…”
Section: Sampling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relational functions between in vitro and in vivo DMD Tydskrif Weidingsveren.S.Afr. (1989), 6(4) (Zacharias, 1986), between in vivo DMD and ME (Corbett, 1978), and between ME and net energy, NE (Garrett, 1980), were used to convert the mean in vitro DMD estimates to NE. Expected livemass gains were then calculated from feed requirement tables (N.R.C.…”
Section: Seasonmentioning
confidence: 99%