1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf01099428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The user modeling shell system BGP-MS

Abstract: BGP-MS is a user modeling shell system that can assist interactive software systems in adapting to their current users by taking the users' presumed knowledge, beliefs, and goals into account. It offers applications several methods for communicating observations concerning the user to BGP-MS, and for obtaining information on currently held assumptions about the user from BGP-MS. It provides a choice of two integrated formalisms for representing beliefs and goals, and includes several types of inferences for dr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The approaches aiming at a dynamic representation of the user's goals, beliefs, and interests employ rule-based systems (Brajnik et al, 1990), logic-based representations (Kok, 1989;Kobsa & Pohl, 1994b), connectionist schemes (Belew, 1986), or relevance networks (Kaplan et al, 1993;Mathé & Chen, 1996). As already mentioned, our user model's representation is a combination of stereotype (ensuring the appropriate context of information access) and an overlay model (ensuring the adaptation to the user's level of experience).…”
Section: Comparison With Other Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approaches aiming at a dynamic representation of the user's goals, beliefs, and interests employ rule-based systems (Brajnik et al, 1990), logic-based representations (Kok, 1989;Kobsa & Pohl, 1994b), connectionist schemes (Belew, 1986), or relevance networks (Kaplan et al, 1993;Mathé & Chen, 1996). As already mentioned, our user model's representation is a combination of stereotype (ensuring the appropriate context of information access) and an overlay model (ensuring the adaptation to the user's level of experience).…”
Section: Comparison With Other Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Users also have different goals when accessing an information system. In some cases they know which concepts to access to achieve their goals and do not need any navigational support (Boyle & Encarnacion, 1994;Kobsa, Müller & Nill, 1994). However, when the goal can not be directly mapped to the structure of the hyperspace or when the hyperspace is large, users need help in navigation and in finding relevant pieces of information.…”
Section: Educational Hypermedia Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at present all work on adaptive presentation in hypermedia are really the works on adaptive text presentation. Some existing adaptive hypermedia systems do contain non-textual items de Rosis et al, 1993;Kobsa et al, 1994), but can not present these items adaptively. At the same time, there are a number of good techniques for adaptive multimedia presentation (Maybury, 1993;André & Rist, 1996) but these techniques have never been used in full-fledged hypermedia systems.…”
Section: Adaptive Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the ¢ring of all applicable inference rules and the activation of all applicable stereotypes, contradictions between assumptions are sought and various resolution strategies applied (`truth maintenance'). (Kobsa and Pohl, 1995;Pohl, 1998) allows assumptions about the user and stereotypical assumptions about user groups to be represented in a ¢rst-order predicate logic. A subset of these assumptions is stored in a terminological logic.…”
Section: Example Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%