2019
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1582138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The validity and reliability of the Basketball Jump Shooting Accuracy Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The construct validity was performed when analyzing the basic movement skills test instruments of ball games consisting of basic movement in basketball, football, and volleyball by using the validity method of criteria related validity with different force types. The validity of instruments analyzed in a constructive way could provide an overview of the ability of an instrument to assess what to be assessed (Boddington et al, 2019) and could be used as a rational basis for establishing an instrument (Beery, 2013). Even the instruments with construct validity levels could test the extent of compatibility between the content and the performance to be measured on the instrument when it is to be used (Bejerholm & Eklund, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The construct validity was performed when analyzing the basic movement skills test instruments of ball games consisting of basic movement in basketball, football, and volleyball by using the validity method of criteria related validity with different force types. The validity of instruments analyzed in a constructive way could provide an overview of the ability of an instrument to assess what to be assessed (Boddington et al, 2019) and could be used as a rational basis for establishing an instrument (Beery, 2013). Even the instruments with construct validity levels could test the extent of compatibility between the content and the performance to be measured on the instrument when it is to be used (Bejerholm & Eklund, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity testing process is basically to prove whether the instrument developed is in accordance with the objectives of the process of developing an instrument and whether the indicators on this instrument can measure what should be measured [8]. The construct validity in developing this instrument is intended to provide knowledge about the ability to carry out an assessment process [9]. Construct validity basically aims to investigate whether students who have high mobility skills score better compared to students who have low ability [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity and reliability of the BJSAT has been supported with the test demonstrating a significant, large difference (d = 0.99, p <0.01) between two-and three-point shots with superior accuracy demonstrated from two-point distance 9 . This finding supports the content validity of the BJSAT and demonstrates the assessment elicits similar differences in shooting accuracy relative to distance from the basket compared to those observed in game situations given accuracy for two-point shots is superior to accuracy for three-point shots during game-play 10,11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This finding supports the content validity of the BJSAT and demonstrates the assessment elicits similar differences in shooting accuracy relative to distance from the basket compared to those observed in game situations given accuracy for two-point shots is superior to accuracy for three-point shots during game-play 10,11 . Relative reliability across four trials of the BJSAT was rated as moderate (ICC = 0.71, p <0.01), while absolute reliability was above the accepted benchmark (CV = 16.2%) 9 . A slightly larger CV is not uncommon due to the inconsistencies of skill accuracy throughout competition where basketball athletes can experience periods of a game with high shooting accuracy followed by periods of poor shooting accuracy 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%