2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-010-0973-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Validity of the Baby and Infant Screen for Children with aUtIsm Traits: Part 1 (BISCUIT: Part 1)

Abstract: A top priority in the field of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) is the development of precise early diagnostic tools that can be completed with minimal time and training. We report on the convergent and divergent validity of the Baby and Infant Screen for Children with aUtIsm Traits (BISCUIT), specifically the BISCUIT-Part 1. Previous research with this scale has determined its reliability and sensitivity/specificity. In this study, a sample of 1,007 toddlers 17-37 months of age were assessed individually. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“… GM, Prechtl's Assessment of General Movements; TIMP, Test of Infant Motor Performance; AIMS, Alberta Infant Motor Scale; PRP, Primitive Reflex Profile; NBI, Neuromotor Behavioral Inventory; Mini‐AHA, Mini‐Assisting Hand Assessment SOMP, Structured Observation of Motor Performance; NSMDA, Neuro‐Sensory Motor Development Assessment; CUE, Continuous Unified Electronic Diary Method; HINE, Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination; Muscle‐Power, Active and Passive Muscle Power; Infanib, Infant Neurological International Battery; Amiel‐Tison, Amiel‐Tison neurological examination; Touwen, Touwen Infant Neurological Examination; NPED, Neuropediatric Development; HK‐PFMDA, Hong Kong Preschool Fine‐Motor Developmental Assessment; KDI, Kilifi Developmental Inventory; BISCUIT, Baby and Infant Screen for Children with Autism Traits; CHOP‐INTEND, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… GM, Prechtl's Assessment of General Movements; TIMP, Test of Infant Motor Performance; AIMS, Alberta Infant Motor Scale; PRP, Primitive Reflex Profile; NBI, Neuromotor Behavioral Inventory; Mini‐AHA, Mini‐Assisting Hand Assessment SOMP, Structured Observation of Motor Performance; NSMDA, Neuro‐Sensory Motor Development Assessment; CUE, Continuous Unified Electronic Diary Method; HINE, Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination; Muscle‐Power, Active and Passive Muscle Power; Infanib, Infant Neurological International Battery; Amiel‐Tison, Amiel‐Tison neurological examination; Touwen, Touwen Infant Neurological Examination; NPED, Neuropediatric Development; HK‐PFMDA, Hong Kong Preschool Fine‐Motor Developmental Assessment; KDI, Kilifi Developmental Inventory; BISCUIT, Baby and Infant Screen for Children with Autism Traits; CHOP‐INTEND, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, few Level 2 screening instruments are suitable for children younger than 3 years and fewer still have been found to be efficacious in children with a developmental age as young as 12 months. Of those available, the Screening Tool for Autism in Two-Year-Olds (STAT; Stone et al 2000Stone et al , 2004 is validated for use in children aged 24 to 36 months, although it has been trialed in younger children (Stone et al 2008); the Baby and Infant Screen for Children with aUtIsm Traits-Part 1 (BISCUIT; Matson et al 2007Matson et al , 2011 can be used in children as young as 17 months; and the Childhood Autism Rating Scale, Second Edition Standard Version (CARS2-ST; Schopler et al 1988Schopler et al , 2010 is suitable for children aged from 24 months. Nevertheless, all of these instruments have limitations, such as reliance on parent report or over-diagnosis in younger children (Nah et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parece relevante verificar se as mudanças nos critérios diagnósticos afetarão a avaliação e identificação dos sinais do autismo. Cabe ainda dizer que apenas estudos sobre o ADEC (Hedley et al, 2015, Matson, Wilkins, & Fodstad, 2011 e o M-CHAT (Inada et al, 2011) apresentaram dados sobre convergência e/ou divergência com outros instrumentos (Tabela 4).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified