1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf01583794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value function of an integer program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is discussed in [TW81,BJ82]. It is interesting to ask what class of groups allows an analogue of the ceiling?…”
Section: Subadditive Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is discussed in [TW81,BJ82]. It is interesting to ask what class of groups allows an analogue of the ceiling?…”
Section: Subadditive Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that, for each t and s, Q s t (x) is the value function of an integer program and is known to be piece-wise constant over certain cones in the space of x with discontinuities along the boundaries of these cones [5]. Existing branch and bound methods for stochastic integer programs attempt to partition the space of first stage variables into (hyper)rectangular cells.…”
Section: A Decomposition Based Branch and Bound Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus Benders' decomposition (Benders, 1962) is applicable in this case (Wollmer, 1980). Otherwise, when the second-stage variables involve integrality restrictions, f (ω, x) is lower semicontinuous with respect to x (Blair and Jeroslow, 1982), and is generally nonconvex (Schultz, 1993). The focus of this paper is on SP2 with x ∈ vert(conv(X)) such as binary first-stage, and mixed-integer second-stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%