2014
DOI: 10.5114/pjp.2014.45782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of tumor markers in the diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma alone and in combination

Abstract: Aim of the study is to evaluate the expression of CK19, galectin-3, HBME-1, CD56,claudin-1andneutrophilgelatinase-associatedlipocalin(NGAL)inpapillarythyroidcarcinoma(PTC),includingclassic,follicularvariantandmicro-carcinoma.Peritumoralbenignthyroidtissueswereusedasacontrol(C). ImmunohistochemicalstainingwiththeEnVisiondetectionsystemwasperformedon 59formalin-fixed,paraffin-embeddedthyroidtissues,including43PTCand16C. CK19, galectin-3, HBME-1, claudin-1 and NGAL were positive in most PTC, butwerenegativeorshow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
21
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
21
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, these ratios were respectively 83.3% and 60% for distinguishing FND-FA and PTC, and 70% and 60% for distinguishing FND-FA and FVPTC. In agreement with the literature [4,8], we observed that usage of CK19 by itself had the highest sensitivity as a marker in distinguishing benign lesions from PTC and FVPTC (83.3%, 70%). However, its specificity was lower due to its positivity in benign lesions (60%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, these ratios were respectively 83.3% and 60% for distinguishing FND-FA and PTC, and 70% and 60% for distinguishing FND-FA and FVPTC. In agreement with the literature [4,8], we observed that usage of CK19 by itself had the highest sensitivity as a marker in distinguishing benign lesions from PTC and FVPTC (83.3%, 70%). However, its specificity was lower due to its positivity in benign lesions (60%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Correct pathological diagnosis is necessary to minimize emotional stress, over-treatments and related financial costs brought by the diagnosis of thyroid cancer [3]. In order to eliminate disagreements among pathologists about well-differentiated lesions of thyroid derived from follicular epithelial cells and achieve diagnostic standardization, there have been many studies made where immunohistochemical and molecular markers are studied [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. The immunohistochemical markers Hector Battifora mesothelial cell epitope-1 (HBME-1), galectin 3 (Gal-3) and cytokeratin 19 (CK19) accepted to be indicators of malignancy in thyroid lesions have been used as products of such studies as panels in most pathology laboratories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several additional studies highlighted claudin-1 as a potential marker of PTC [10][11][12][13][14]. In contrast to PTCs, absent or weak incomplete membranous claudin-1 expression has been reported in follicular adenomas [11][12][13], follicular thyroid carcinomas (FTC) [11], and non-malignant thyroid tissue samples [11][12][13][14]. Similar to HBME-1 expression at sites of follicular epithelial dysplasia [15,21], claudin-1 expression has been reported in thyroiditis-related follicular epithelial dysplasia [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among various claudins, increased claudin-1 expression has been reported as a feature of PTC [10][11][12][13][14], whereas absence or weak expression is noted in non-tumorous thyroid parenchyma and some benign follicular epithelial-derived proliferations [10][11][12][13][14]. A few series provided the positivity rates of claudin-1 expression in classic and follicular variant PTCs [11,13]; however, to the best our knowledge, no studies have compared the status of claudin-1 expression profile with respect non-invasive RAS-like and invasive RAS-like phenotypes in PTCs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tall cell and solid PTC variants showed the diversity of staining (2/3; 66.67% and 13/23; 56.52 % respectively), while PTCs with a mixed histological pattern containing insular areas were mainly weakly positive (2/5; 40.0%) [20]. For a single analyzed tumor marker, the sensitivity of HBME-1 was 86% and the specificity was 100% [21]. Among 88 FNAs with histological control, the sensitivity of HBME-1 to predict PTC was 87.5% (28/32) and the specificity was 86% (48/56).…”
Section: Hbme-1mentioning
confidence: 97%