2001
DOI: 10.1006/eesa.2000.1983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Variation in Slope of Concentration–Effect Relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When constructing a SSD, the choice of the distribution function to fit of the data and describe the distribution is arbitrary and usually based on best-fit results [14,15]. Log-logistic and lognormal distributions often are used for toxic stressors because effect concentrations can differ between species by several orders of magnitude [16].…”
Section: Derivation Of the Ssdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When constructing a SSD, the choice of the distribution function to fit of the data and describe the distribution is arbitrary and usually based on best-fit results [14,15]. Log-logistic and lognormal distributions often are used for toxic stressors because effect concentrations can differ between species by several orders of magnitude [16].…”
Section: Derivation Of the Ssdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In toxicity testing of single species, common slopes of concentration-response curves have often been assumed for compounds with the same mode of action although no evidence has been found to confirm this assumption (58). As a pragmatic solution to this dilemma, three options were explored for obtaining parallel SSD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slopes of the concentration‐response curves range between 2.7 to 20.9. Although the mode of toxic action is often suggested as an explanation for different slopes of concentration‐effect curves, Smit et al found no distinction between the slope values of narcotic substances and substances with a specific mode of action [25]. Consequently, this topic is not taken into further considerations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%