1992
DOI: 10.1016/0306-9877(92)90187-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The vasa vasorum and the paradox of beta-blocker therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another cannulation experiment that again confirmed the dilator potency of microcirculatory PNA involved eliminating the presence of tonically released NA in the microcirculation of a CLSV segment by stimulating the segment with reserpine or guanethidine until it ceased to respond to electrical stimulation and then finding that the SO stimulation increased significantly, on one occasion by 91%, from an initial 46 to a subsequent 86 mmHg rise in perfusion pressure [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Another cannulation experiment that again confirmed the dilator potency of microcirculatory PNA involved eliminating the presence of tonically released NA in the microcirculation of a CLSV segment by stimulating the segment with reserpine or guanethidine until it ceased to respond to electrical stimulation and then finding that the SO stimulation increased significantly, on one occasion by 91%, from an initial 46 to a subsequent 86 mmHg rise in perfusion pressure [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…ISO into a valve sinus on three occasions and finding it caused a 174 mmHg rise in the overall perfusion pressure of the segment on each occasion [20], compared to the 130 mm Hg rise 6.0 µM intraluminal NA would be expected-by extrapolation from a dose response curve [14] -to cause. Given that aggers block ~ 93% of any drug injected into a valve sinus from perfusing its associated microcirculatory module, the difference in sensitivity to NA stimulating a blood vessel through its lumen and through its microcirculation is, in fact, much greater than the figures quoted indicate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, unlike its intralumenal dilator effect, which involved the entire length of a constricted segment, the constrictor effect of ISO was stenotic and localised to a short section of the segment upstream of the junction of the injected tributary ( Fig. 1) and upstream, also, of a competent ostial valve in the lumen of the perfused segment [11,18], two facts that ruled out the possibility ISO had acted intralumenally. And because the segment was doubly cannulated that ruled out the possibility ISO had acted through the adventitial surface.…”
Section: New Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%