2015
DOI: 10.4324/9781315732541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Warsaw Pact Reconsidered

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only in Romania in 1965-6 did socialist elites encourage radical anti-US and pro-Vietnamese demonstrations in public, to demonstrate their support for Chinese criticism of the allegedly limited support offered by the Soviet Union, and in so doing encourage their population to identify with a struggle that echoed their own attempts to assert independence from the major world power in their own backyard. 67 Across the eastern bloc -albeit to varying degrees in different countries -student groups, intellectuals and young workers challenged the limitations of their states' official solidarity movements. This may have been partly the result of unintended encouragement: official solidarity often gave the impression of urging youth to 'exceed' the movement's institutional forms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only in Romania in 1965-6 did socialist elites encourage radical anti-US and pro-Vietnamese demonstrations in public, to demonstrate their support for Chinese criticism of the allegedly limited support offered by the Soviet Union, and in so doing encourage their population to identify with a struggle that echoed their own attempts to assert independence from the major world power in their own backyard. 67 Across the eastern bloc -albeit to varying degrees in different countries -student groups, intellectuals and young workers challenged the limitations of their states' official solidarity movements. This may have been partly the result of unintended encouragement: official solidarity often gave the impression of urging youth to 'exceed' the movement's institutional forms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 We nevertheless suggest that this crisis was pivotal for the evolution of the organisations, creating a 'dynamics of dissent', which caused both the organisations and their members to emancipate themselves to some extent from the Soviet grip. 22 The resolution of this crisis proves that both organisations evolved into institutions which learnt to cope with dissent and diverging national interests, and which developed the potential to operate as collective actors. They thus began to fulfil enough of the abovementioned criteria of 'international organisations' to be considered as such, however imperfectly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%