2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11225-015-9603-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Weak Choice Principle WISC may Fail in the Category of Sets

Abstract: Abstract.The set-theoretic axiom WISC states that for every set there is a set of surjections to it cofinal in all such surjections. By constructing an unbounded topos over the category of sets and using an extension of the internal logic of a topos due to Shulman, we show that WISC is independent of the rest of the axioms of the set theory given by a well-pointed topos. This also gives an example of a topos that is not a predicative topos as defined by van den Berg.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such toposes are models for set theory without the Axiom of Choice, and categories internal to them are simply small categories. Examples are given by the categories of sets in models of ZF as given by Gitik (cf [15]) and Karagila [4], or the topos constructed in the author's [10].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such toposes are models for set theory without the Axiom of Choice, and categories internal to them are simply small categories. Examples are given by the categories of sets in models of ZF as given by Gitik (cf [15]) and Karagila [4], or the topos constructed in the author's [10].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus starting from the category of sets in classical set theory with AC, it holds in the kinds of topos that have been used to model type theory with various kinds of higher inductive types, whose semantics motivates the work presented here. (However, WISC does not hold in all toposes, as Roberts [27] shows.) For the theorem below we need to use the double cover signature ∆ X of a set X ∈ Set, inspired by the use that Swan [31] makes of WISC; see also [14,Definition 5.6].…”
Section: Initial Algebras For Sized Endofunctorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Note that in classical set theory AC implies WISC: the axiom of choice implies that covers split and so we can take Cov A to be the type 1 with unique element 0 ∶ 1 and Dom A 0 = A. WISC is independent of ZF in classical logic [Kar14;Rob15]. In constructive logic it is preserved by many ways of making new toposes from existing ones, in particular by the formation of sheaf toposes and realizability toposes over a given topos [vdBM14].…”
Section: Weakly Initial Sets Of Coversmentioning
confidence: 99%