1993
DOI: 10.1006/biol.1993.1092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The WHO-EPI Initiative for the Global Eradication of Poliomyelitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the elimination of poliovirus from large parts of the world, Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) has become the most important clinical cause of AFP. [1] Various studies around the world have found prevalence of GBS among acute flaccid paralysis patients of 42- 47%. [23] Higher prevalence has been reported from Honduras (72%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the elimination of poliovirus from large parts of the world, Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) has become the most important clinical cause of AFP. [1] Various studies around the world have found prevalence of GBS among acute flaccid paralysis patients of 42- 47%. [23] Higher prevalence has been reported from Honduras (72%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monitoring vaccine coverage is used as a measure of program progress, while monitoring disease incidence through surveillance programs (either with acute flaccid paralysis -AFP -surveillance or viral isolation) is used as a measure of its impact [2]. These measures have been proven extremely efficient and there has been a considerable reduction in the number of cases reported worldwide during the last decade [3][4][5][6][7]. Even before the WHO decision, the Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO) presented an even more audacious proposal, with the goal of interrupting thetransmission of wild Poliovirus in the Americas by 1990 [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ultimate goals of the poliomyelitis eradication program are total interruption of wild Poliovirus transmission and zero poliomyelitis incidence. In order to achieve these goals, the most efficient manner to eradicate transmission of wild polioviruses is to maintain both high vaccine coverage and an adequate system of epidemiological (AFP) and laboratory (viral isolation) surveillance [2,3,15,16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be fair, no one knew just how serious they would become, but the rhetoric of polio eradication in the mid-1990s seems willfully naïve in retrospect. For example, in 1993, planners believed that if all endemic countries conducted two mass campaigns from fixed points per year by 1995, supplemented with house-to-house ''mop-up'' activities twice per year in stubborn areas by 1997, polio would be eradicated by the year 2000 (Ward et al 1993). Worldwide, countries were not sufficiently enthused about polio eradication to adopt it on this schedule (all countries did not begin mass vaccination until 1998), but even if they had, this schedule of immunizations would have been woefully inadequate to interrupt transmission in places like Pakistan.…”
Section: S Clossermentioning
confidence: 99%