1986
DOI: 10.1075/li.10.1.02des
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical Analysis of Reflexivization in the Framework of Applicative Grammar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet Langacker & Munro do not take such possibilities into account. Desclés, Guenchéva & Shaumyan (1986) and Shaumyan (1987) describe two general meaningsof the reflexive markers: nondistinction and intransitivity. Shaumyan (1987, 242-243) follows the conclusion o f Langacker & Munro, for whom in his words, "reflexive predicates involve the nondistinction o f the agent and patient.…”
Section: Anti-taxonom Ic Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet Langacker & Munro do not take such possibilities into account. Desclés, Guenchéva & Shaumyan (1986) and Shaumyan (1987) describe two general meaningsof the reflexive markers: nondistinction and intransitivity. Shaumyan (1987, 242-243) follows the conclusion o f Langacker & Munro, for whom in his words, "reflexive predicates involve the nondistinction o f the agent and patient.…”
Section: Anti-taxonom Ic Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%