1990
DOI: 10.3208/sandf1972.30.3_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical Aspects of the Elastoplastic-Viscoplastic Bounding Surface Model for Cohesive Soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first is the traditional theoretical method, including the elasto-plastic [7,16] and elasto-visco-plastic models [30,31], where the deformation of each loading cycle is strictly counted. This method reveals the deformation mechanism of soils subjected to cyclic loading.…”
Section: Cyclic Loading Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is the traditional theoretical method, including the elasto-plastic [7,16] and elasto-visco-plastic models [30,31], where the deformation of each loading cycle is strictly counted. This method reveals the deformation mechanism of soils subjected to cyclic loading.…”
Section: Cyclic Loading Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple constitutive model that can describe the nonlinearity, creep and stress relaxation of cohesive soil was used in the present study. The coupling of viscoplastic response with elastoplastic response of soils, as discussed in Kaliakin and Dafalias (1990) was not considered in the model, which is only approximate. However, the Finite Element procedure employing this soil model was still able to duplicate the salient features of long-term soil-reinforcement interaction, as indicated by the satisfactory prediction of model test results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, the Modified Cam-clay model (Roscoe and Burland, 1968) was developed with an elliptical yield surface, and is widely used for simulating the mechanical behavior of clays. Several well known clay models (Kavvadas, 1982;Anandarajah and Dafalias, 1986;Banerjee and Yousif, 1986;Dafalias, 1986Dafalias, , 1987Kaliakin and Dafalias, 1990;Crouch and Wolf, 1992;Whittle and Kavvadas, 1994) are extensions of the Modified Cam-clay model. Some models (for example, Crouch and Wolf, 1992) adopted a shape parameter R (≥2.0) in extending the Modified Cam-clay yield surface to the tension side.…”
Section: Yield Surface and Plastic Potential Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%