2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2020.412047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical design of SnTe/GeS lateral heterostructures: A first-principles study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 33 ] In SnTe, the directions parallel or antiparallel to its in‐plane polarization are defined as <10> (armchair), while the in‐plane direction perpendicular to its polarization is defined as <01> (zigzag). In contrast to previous theoretical studies, which focus on the interfaces along <10> directions [ 43–49 ] the SnTe/PbTe interfaces in our experiments mainly occur along the <11> directions (Figure 1b,c), which are also the preferred directions for the exposed edges in stand‐alone SnTe and PbTe ML nanoplates. [ 33 ] Atom resolved STM topography imaging confirmed atomically sharp interfaces (Figure 1d).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 33 ] In SnTe, the directions parallel or antiparallel to its in‐plane polarization are defined as <10> (armchair), while the in‐plane direction perpendicular to its polarization is defined as <01> (zigzag). In contrast to previous theoretical studies, which focus on the interfaces along <10> directions [ 43–49 ] the SnTe/PbTe interfaces in our experiments mainly occur along the <11> directions (Figure 1b,c), which are also the preferred directions for the exposed edges in stand‐alone SnTe and PbTe ML nanoplates. [ 33 ] Atom resolved STM topography imaging confirmed atomically sharp interfaces (Figure 1d).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the similar lattice parameters and compatible crystalline structures of MX MLs, it is straightforward to conceive functional LHSs between these materials and multiple theoretical studies have proposed devices such as diodes and tunneling FETs. [ 43–49 ] Nevertheless, because of the relatively strong interlayer coupling in orthorhombic MX materials, it is difficult to obtain large‐area MX ML flakes through mechanical exfoliation, making controlled growth or etching preparation methods a necessity. [ 50,51 ] Here we applied a two‐step MBE growth procedure to prepare SnTe/PbTe ML LHS nanoplates with PbTe in the core and SnTe at the perimeter, as schematically shown in Figure a.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The left half is g-C 3 N 4 and the right half is C 2 N- h 2D, so we call these nanoribbons g-C 3 N 4 /C 2 N- h 2D. 38 Where the lattice constant a is 35.5 Å and b is 8.26 Å. In Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond the intrinsic excellent properties, several methods have been proposed to modulate the electronic properties of monolayer GeS. In vertical or lateral heterostructures based on monolayer GeS, type-Ⅱ band alignment can be often obtained, which is conducive to the separation of electron and holes and greatly improves the efficiency of solar cells [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. Besides, the band gap of monolayer GeS can be modulated in the range of 0-2 eV by strain [3,[42][43][44][45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%