2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.02.159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical inspection of Ni/α-SiX (X=N, P, As, Sb, Bi) Single-Atom catalyst: Ultra-high performance for hydrogen evolution reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the band structure plot (see Figure a,e), we clearly observed indirect band gaps of 1.75 and 1.50 eV for the α-SiN and α-SiP monolayers, respectively. Here, the calculated bond lengths and bond angles, together with the band gaps ( E G ) of the α-SiN and α-SiP monolayers, respectively, are in good accordance with previously reported DFT studies ,, as shown in Section 1 (see Table S1) of Supporting Information.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…From the band structure plot (see Figure a,e), we clearly observed indirect band gaps of 1.75 and 1.50 eV for the α-SiN and α-SiP monolayers, respectively. Here, the calculated bond lengths and bond angles, together with the band gaps ( E G ) of the α-SiN and α-SiP monolayers, respectively, are in good accordance with previously reported DFT studies ,, as shown in Section 1 (see Table S1) of Supporting Information.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…From the volcano plot (eq ), we can clearly conclude that the HER activity of 6% strained 2D AgCaAs is close to that of Pt, Pd, Ir, h-B 2 O, and Ni/α-SiN and better than that of Ni, W, Mo(110), Mo(100), Co, Re, Nb, C-doped o-B 2 N 2 , and P-doped 2D α-CN ,,,,, (see Figure ). We therefore believe that the present study makes better sense of the fact that the non-trivial topology is correlated with the surface reactivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The E bin is calculated from the following formula: E bin = E (Cu( ii )–salen complex + MWW) − E (Cu( ii )–salen complex) − E (MWW)where E (Cu( ii )–salen complex + MWW), E (Cu( ii )–salen complex) and E (MWW) are the total energy of MWW zeolite encapsulated Cu( ii )–salen complex, Cu( ii )–salen complex and MWW zeolite, respectively. 83 In general, the negative value of calculated E bin indicates the significant interaction of Cu( ii )–salen complex with MWW zeolite and positive value of E bin indicates very poor interaction (not possible) of Cu( ii )–salen complex with MWW zeolite. In present study, the calculated E bin (using eqn (1)) is −4.75 eV which ensures good interaction between Cu( ii )–salen complex and MWW zeolite.…”
Section: Theoretical Studies and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%